Relive the nostalgia! The Samsung D500 and E250 represent a bygone era of feature phones, offering simple functionality and durable designs. But which of these classic devices holds up best today? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both the D500 and E250 are basic feature phones. The E250 likely offered slightly improved design and ergonomics. Ultimately, the choice depends on personal preference for aesthetics and minor feature differences, as both provide a reliable, no-frills experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| EDGE | Yes (in D500E version only) | Yes |
| GPRS | Class 10 | Class 10 |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2004, Q4 | 2006, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 93.5 x 45.7 x 23.5 mm (3.68 x 1.80 x 0.93 in) | 99.5 x 49.5 x 14.1 mm (3.92 x 1.95 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 99 g (3.49 oz) | 80 g (2.82 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 176 x 220 pixels (~148 ppi density) | 128 x 160 pixels (~102 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.9 inches, 11.4 cm2 (~26.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 2.0 inches, 32 x 40 mm, 12.6 cm2 (~25.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT, 256K colors | TFT, 65K colors |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 dialed, 20 received, 20 missed calls | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls |
| Card slot | No | microSD (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | - | 10MB |
| Phonebook | 1000 x 12 fields, Photo call | 1000 entries, Photocall |
| | 96 MB shared memory for photos, video, MMS, MP3 files
4 MB for Java
200 short messages
400 calendar events | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 1.3 MP | VGA |
| Video | Yes | QCIF |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Video | Yes | - |
| | No | No |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 1.1 | 2.0, A2DP |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | Proprietary | 1.1 |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | WAP 2.0/xHTML |
| Games | 3 + downloadable | Yes + downloadable |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| Messaging | SMS, EMS, MMS, Email | SMS, EMS, MMS, Email |
| | MP3/MP4/AAC player
Predictive text input
SyncML
Organizer
Voice memo | MP3/AAC/AAC+ player
Predictive text input
Organizer
Voice memo |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 380 h | Up to 250 h |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h | Up to 5 h |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery | Removable Li-Ion 750 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Black | Silver, Black |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.48 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) | 0.70 W/kg (head) |
Samsung D500
- Rugged design
- Long battery life
- Simple to use
- Reliable for basic calls and texts
- Low-resolution display
- Limited features
- Basic camera (if present)
- Slow performance
Samsung E250
- Potentially improved ergonomics
- Long battery life
- Simple to use
- Reliable for basic calls and texts
- Low-resolution display
- Limited features
- Basic camera (if present)
- Slow performance
Display Comparison
Given the era, both phones likely featured small, low-resolution color displays. The E250 might have a marginally better screen due to potential design refinements, but the difference would be minimal. Expect limited viewing angles and pixelation.
Camera Comparison
Neither phone likely had a sophisticated camera. If either had a camera, it would be a very low-resolution, basic model. Image quality would be poor by modern standards. Don't expect anything beyond novelty photos.
Performance
Performance will be limited by the processors of the time. Both phones are designed for basic calling and texting, so expect slow menu navigation and limited multitasking capabilities. There's no meaningful performance difference to expect.
Battery Life
Battery life was a strong point for feature phones. Both the D500 and E250 likely offered several days of standby time with moderate use. The E250 might have a slightly larger battery, potentially extending its battery life marginally.
Buying Guide
The Samsung D500 is for those seeking a very basic, rugged phone for emergencies or as a secondary device. The Samsung E250 is ideal for users who appreciate a slightly more refined design and potentially better call quality within the limitations of the era.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Are these phones compatible with modern SIM cards?
Likely not. These phones use older SIM card technologies. You'll need a compatible SIM card from your carrier.
❓ Can I use these phones for internet browsing?
Internet browsing is extremely limited, if possible at all. The screens are too small and the processors too slow for a usable experience.