ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality, software experience, and long-term support, the Google Pixel 7a is the stronger choice. Its Tensor G2 chip, while not leading in raw CPU power, delivers a smoother, more intelligent experience, and its camera consistently produces excellent results. However, the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ offers significantly faster charging for those who value convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 28, 41, 78, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192.5 g (6.81 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 770 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 55% in 15 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4510 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Starry | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | 9042N | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+
- 66W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
- Mediatek Dimensity 810 offers decent performance for everyday tasks.
- Potentially lower price point compared to the Pixel 7a.
- Software experience likely less refined than Google's Pixel UI.
- Camera performance likely inferior to the Pixel 7a.
- Limited information available on display quality and battery capacity.
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera quality with Google's computational photography.
- Smooth and intuitive software experience with guaranteed updates.
- Powerful Tensor G2 chip excels in AI and machine learning tasks.
- Slower 18W charging compared to the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+.
- May be more expensive than the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+.
- Battery life, while good, isn't exceptional.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Voyage 40 Pro+'s display specifications are not provided, it's likely to be lower, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with its brightness, offers a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, a feature increasingly common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a key differentiator. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, consistently delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Voyage 40 Pro+’s camera specifications are unknown, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Google’s image processing algorithms are renowned for their dynamic range and detail preservation, giving the Pixel 7a a significant edge. The Pixel 7a also excels in video recording, offering features like Cinematic Pan and Speech Enhancement.
Performance
The Google Tensor G2 (5nm) and Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) represent different approaches to performance. The Tensor G2, with its Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.85 GHz, prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, resulting in faster image processing and voice recognition. The Dimensity 810, while featuring a higher clock speed on its A76 cores (2.4 GHz), utilizes a less efficient 6nm process. This means the Tensor G2 is likely to offer better sustained performance and thermal management during demanding tasks like gaming. The Pixel 7a’s CPU architecture, with its A78 performance cores, also provides a performance advantage over the Voyage 40 Pro+'s A55 cores.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. The ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 66W wired charging is a major advantage. Achieving 55% charge in just 15 minutes significantly reduces downtime. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, while supporting PD3.0, is considerably slower. This difference in charging speed is the most significant advantage the Voyage 40 Pro+ holds, appealing to users who prioritize quick top-ups over extended battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are comfortable with a less polished software experience. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up quickly and don't rely heavily on Google's AI features. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a superior camera, a clean and intuitive software experience with guaranteed updates, and a more balanced overall package, even if it means slower charging speeds.