The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches to achieving this goal, primarily through chipset choice and charging implementation. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and slightly faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a well-rounded experience, and the 67W charging, achieving 50% in 15 minutes, provides a tangible benefit over the ZTE's 66W implementation.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 28, 41, 78, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.5 g (6.81 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 770 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833P Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 55% in 15 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4510 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Starry | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | 9042N | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+
- Potentially higher CPU single-core performance with Dimensity 810
- 66W fast charging support
- Competitive 5G connectivity
- Missing display brightness data
- Limited camera specification details
- Uncertain RAM configuration
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- Faster charging (67W with PD3.0/QC3)
- Proven Snapdragon 695 performance
- Slightly lower theoretical CPU single-core performance
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
- Endurance rating is shared with the ZTE
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, a significant advantage over the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+, for which brightness data is unavailable. This higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. While both displays are likely to have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher peak brightness is a clear win for users who frequently consume content in bright environments. The absence of refresh rate data for the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s likely 120Hz panel would offer a smoother scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its strong image processing capabilities. Without sensor size or aperture information for the ZTE, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s camera system is likely to offer a more consistent and refined photographic experience, assuming it follows Xiaomi’s typical camera tuning.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm), while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (also 6nm). The Dimensity 810’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer a slight theoretical advantage in single-core performance over the Snapdragon 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon typically excels in sustained performance and GPU efficiency. Both phones utilize a 6nm process, suggesting comparable power efficiency, but the Snapdragon 695’s optimized architecture may provide better thermal management during prolonged gaming sessions. The lack of RAM specifications for the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ makes a direct memory performance comparison impossible.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (unspecified for the ZTE). However, charging speeds differ. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, achieves 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+’s 66W charging reaches 55% in 15 minutes. While the difference isn’t massive, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s faster overall charging time provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ if you prioritize a potentially more powerful CPU for demanding tasks and are comfortable with a charging speed that, while fast, isn't quite as quick as the Xiaomi. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prefer a more balanced experience with a proven chipset, a brighter display (746 nits measured), and a slightly faster charging solution, making it ideal for users who value convenience and consistent performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. Genshin Impact may require lower settings to maintain a smooth experience. While not a dedicated gaming chipset, the 695 provides a respectable gaming experience for the price point, and its thermal management is generally good.
❓ How does the 66W charging on the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ compare to the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in real-world usage?
While both offer fast charging, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, coupled with PD3.0 and QC3 support, is slightly faster overall. It reaches 50% in 15 minutes, while the ZTE takes slightly longer. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also achieves a full charge in 42 minutes, compared to the ZTE’s unspecified time, suggesting a more efficient charging curve.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ a major concern?
Yes, it is. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or image processing capabilities, it’s difficult to assess the camera’s performance. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G benefits from Qualcomm’s ISP and likely offers a more consistent and reliable camera experience.
