The ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge in their core components – the Voyage 40 Pro+ leverages Mediatek’s Dimensity 810, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and slightly faster charging, the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 810 chipset offers a modest performance edge over the Snapdragon 695, and its 66W charging is quicker to 55% than the Poco's 67W to 70%. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s endurance rating is identical, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 28, 41, 78, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.5 g (6.81 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 770 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833P Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 55% in 15 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4510 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Starry | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 9042N | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+
- Potentially better CPU performance with Dimensity 810
- Faster initial charging (55% in 15 minutes)
- Likely slightly better GPU performance
- Battery life not explicitly stated
- Thermal throttling potential under heavy load
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Excellent battery endurance (119h)
- Fast charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Proven track record for value
- Slightly lower CPU performance compared to Dimensity 810
- Longer full charge time (41 minutes)
Display Comparison
Both the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, specific details like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price bracket, it’s likely both displays target FHD+ resolution. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both feature a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both may include one, offering limited practical value. Image processing style will likely differ – ZTE often leans towards more saturated colors, while Xiaomi tends towards a more natural look. The absence of details makes it impossible to determine which phone offers superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) counters with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While both are 6nm chips, the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 810 generally offer a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695’s Adreno 619 GPU is a capable performer, but the Dimensity 810’s Mali-G52 MC2 GPU is likely to provide a slightly better graphical experience. RAM speed is not specified, but LPDDR4X is probable in both cases. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity 810 may require more aggressive throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts an endurance rating of 119 hours, a solid figure indicating good battery life. The ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+’s battery life is not specified, but given the similar chipset power draw, it’s likely comparable. Charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging, reaching 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, with support for PD3.0 and QC3. The ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ offers 66W wired charging, claiming 55% charge in 15 minutes. While the Poco takes longer to reach full charge, the initial charging speed is competitive. The identical endurance ratings suggest the slightly slower full charge time of the Poco won't be a significant drawback for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ if you need a phone that handles multitasking and moderate gaming with a bit more headroom, and if you value slightly faster initial charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer a phone with a proven track record of battery endurance and are looking for the most cost-effective 5G experience, accepting a slight performance trade-off.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 810 in the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ get noticeably hotter than the Snapdragon 695 during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 810, while offering a performance edge, is built on a slightly less refined process than some Snapdragon chips. This means it's more likely to generate heat under sustained load, potentially leading to thermal throttling and reduced performance during long gaming sessions. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 is generally more efficient, but both phones will likely experience some heat buildup.
❓ Is the 66W charging on the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ significantly faster in real-world use compared to the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G?
While the ZTE Voyage 40 Pro+ advertises 55% charge in 15 minutes, the Poco X4 Pro 5G reaches 70% in 22 minutes. The initial charging speed is indeed faster on the ZTE, but the Poco’s 67W charging is still very competitive. The difference in full charge time (41 minutes for Poco vs. unspecified for ZTE) is more substantial, but the identical endurance ratings suggest this won't be a major concern for most users.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, should I assume the camera quality is roughly the same on both phones?
That's a reasonable assumption. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, it's difficult to differentiate the camera performance. Both phones likely employ similar mid-range camera setups, and image quality will likely depend more on software optimization than raw hardware capabilities.
