Oppo Find X3 Pro vs. ZTE Voyage 20 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro remains the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset delivers significantly higher performance, crucial for demanding tasks and future-proofing. While the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro offers competitive 66W charging, it can't match the X3 Pro's overall processing power and established feature set.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Voyage 20 Pro | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 04 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 15 min | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | 9040N | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Voyage 20 Pro
- Faster overall performance with Snapdragon 888
- Brighter and higher quality display
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Potentially higher price point
- Older chipset (though still powerful)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Faster initial wired charging speed (to 50%)
- More affordable price
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly weaker chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
- Lacks wireless charging
- Limited display information
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 774 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Voyage 20 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the X3 Pro’s high brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) provide a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The X3 Pro’s panel technology, though not explicitly stated as LTPO, was a leading-edge display at its release, likely offering adaptive refresh rates for improved efficiency. The lack of detailed display information for the Voyage 20 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X3 Pro clearly holds an advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited for the Voyage 20 Pro. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s camera system, while details are missing here, was lauded for its color science and overall image quality at launch. The Snapdragon 888’s image signal processor (ISP) provides advanced processing capabilities, enhancing dynamic range and noise reduction. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details for the Voyage 20 Pro, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the X3 Pro’s flagship pedigree and ISP advantage likely result in superior image and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Find X3 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm), while the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, significantly outperforms the Dimensity 720’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the X3 Pro. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 720 is a capable mid-range chip, but it simply cannot compete with the flagship-level power of the Snapdragon 888.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro has an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating solid battery life. It supports 65W wired charging, achieving 40% charge in just 10 minutes, and offers 30W wireless charging (100% in 80 minutes) alongside 10W reverse wireless charging. The ZTE Voyage 20 Pro counters with 66W wired charging, reaching 50% in 15 minutes. While the Voyage 20 Pro’s wired charging is slightly faster initially, the X3 Pro’s wireless charging options and overall endurance rating provide greater versatility. The similar charging speeds, combined with the X3 Pro’s longer endurance, make it the more practical choice for all-day use.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro if you prioritize fast charging and a lower price point, and your primary use case revolves around everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications, and value a proven flagship experience with a brighter display and potentially better camera image processing.