OnePlus 9 Pro vs. ZTE Voyage 20 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and a refined software experience, the OnePlus 9 Pro is the clear winner. However, the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro offers a compelling alternative with competitive charging and a potentially lower price, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Voyage 20 Pro | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 04 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 15 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | 9040N | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
ZTE Voyage 20 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 888
- Faster wireless charging options
- More refined camera system with Hasselblad tuning
- Potentially higher price point
- Snapdragon 888 can generate more heat under sustained load
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Faster initial wired charging speed (50% in 15 min)
- Potentially more affordable price
- Competitive battery endurance
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 720)
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 9 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 859 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display in most conditions. While the Voyage 20 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, OnePlus’s panel likely offers superior color accuracy and potentially a higher refresh rate, contributing to a smoother visual experience. The absence of LTPO information for the Voyage 20 Pro suggests it may not have the same dynamic refresh rate capabilities as the OnePlus 9 Pro, potentially impacting battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro. The OnePlus 9 Pro, leveraging Hasselblad’s color science, likely offers a more refined and consistent image processing pipeline. While sensor size and aperture details are missing for the Voyage 20 Pro, the Snapdragon 888’s image signal processor (ISP) in the OnePlus 9 Pro provides superior image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details regarding OIS on the Voyage 20 Pro suggests it may lack the stabilization features found on the OnePlus 9 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the OnePlus 9 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm), while the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a significant performance advantage over the Voyage 20 Pro’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the OnePlus 9 Pro. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 720 is a capable mid-range chip, but it won't match the Snapdragon 888's capabilities.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 86 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Voyage 20 Pro). However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The OnePlus 9 Pro offers 65W wired charging (100% in 29 minutes), 50W wireless charging (100% in 43 minutes), and 5W reverse wireless charging. The ZTE Voyage 20 Pro boasts 66W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes), a faster initial charge rate, but lacks wireless charging options. This makes the OnePlus 9 Pro more versatile for users who prefer wireless convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Voyage 20 Pro if you need fast 66W charging and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you prioritize top-tier performance for demanding applications, gaming, and benefit from a more established camera system and software support.