ZTE offers two compelling options in the budget smartphone space: the ZTE V70, powered by the modern Mediatek Dimensity 810, and the ZTE Blade A76 4G, prioritizing exceptional battery endurance. This comparison dissects their key differences, helping you determine which device best aligns with your priorities – raw processing power or all-day battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing responsiveness and 5G connectivity, the ZTE V70 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 810 chipset delivers significantly faster performance. However, the ZTE Blade A76 4G excels for those who value extended battery life and don't require the latest in processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 05 | 2025, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June | Available. Released 2025, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 1.8 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | - |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11.5 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | Yes |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Unspecified |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 15 min | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Olive Green | Silver, Gold, Violet |
| Models | - | Z2474 |
| Price | - | € 93.19 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 54:20h endurance, 800 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
ZTE V70
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 810
- 66W fast charging for quick power-ups
- Likely supports 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Battery life likely shorter than the Blade A76 4G
- Limited battery life data available
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Exceptional battery life (54:20h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles) for longevity
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Slower processor for demanding tasks
- Slower 22.5W charging
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, making a direct comparison impossible. However, given the V70’s focus on performance, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel than the Blade A76 4G, potentially offering smoother scrolling and animations. The Blade A76 4G, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz LCD panel. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown, but the V70’s positioning suggests a more modern display design.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the V70, being a newer device, likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms. The Blade A76 4G’s camera is likely sufficient for casual snapshots, but the V70 should deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details suggests neither phone features a flagship-level camera system.
Performance
The ZTE V70’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the ZTE Blade A76 4G’s unspecified octa-core 1.8 GHz processor. The Dimensity 810’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, provide significantly faster single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 6nm process node also contributes to improved power efficiency compared to the likely larger node used in the Blade A76 4G. This translates to better sustained performance under load and less thermal throttling. The Blade A76 4G is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade A76 4G’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 54 hours and 20 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the ZTE V70, which lacks published battery life data. While the V70 compensates with 66W wired charging – capable of adding 50% charge in just 15 minutes – the Blade A76 4G’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Blade A76 4G also boasts an impressive 800 charge cycles, suggesting long-term battery health. The V70’s faster charging is beneficial for quick top-ups, but the Blade A76 4G’s overall endurance is more impactful for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE V70 if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, streaming, or multitasking, and 5G connectivity is important. Its 66W charging also minimizes downtime. Buy the ZTE Blade A76 4G if you prioritize battery life above all else, frequently travel without easy access to charging, or primarily use your phone for basic communication and light tasks. The Blade A76 4G’s 54:20h endurance is a significant advantage for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the ZTE V70 in real-world use compared to the Blade A76 4G?
The Dimensity 810 in the V70 offers a substantial performance uplift. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, especially when running demanding applications like games or video editing software. The Blade A76 4G will feel noticeably slower in these scenarios.
❓ Is the 66W charging on the ZTE V70 a game-changer, or is the Blade A76 4G’s battery life more important?
It depends on your usage. 66W charging is convenient for quickly topping up the V70, but the Blade A76 4G’s exceptional battery life means you’ll likely need to charge it far less frequently. If you often forget to charge your phone or are away from power outlets for extended periods, the Blade A76 4G’s endurance is more valuable.
❓ Will the ZTE V70 be able to handle graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 810 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, but likely at medium to high settings rather than maximum. The 6nm process should help mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, but performance will still be limited compared to flagship chipsets.
❓ How does the 800 charge cycle rating of the Blade A76 4G impact its long-term usability?
The 800 charge cycle rating indicates the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its capacity even after hundreds of charge-discharge cycles. This suggests the Blade A76 4G’s battery will remain healthy and provide reliable performance for a longer period than phones with lower cycle ratings.
