ZTE S30 Pro vs vivo X60 Pro+: Which Snapdragon Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and raw processing power, the vivo X60 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset and superior camera system justify the price premium. However, the ZTE S30 Pro offers a compelling balance of performance and affordability, making it ideal for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE S30 Pro | vivo X60 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 31 | 2021, January 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 03 | Available. Released 2021, January 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 75.2 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MyOS 11 | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF |
| Single | 44 MP | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 55W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4200 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink/Blue | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Models | A2122H | V2056A, V2047 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) |
ZTE S30 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Competent Snapdragon 768G performance for everyday tasks
- 55W fast charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 888
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Missing detailed display specifications
vivo X60 Pro+
- Flagship Snapdragon 888 performance
- Superior camera system with advanced ISP
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Larger file sizes for photos and videos
Display Comparison
The vivo X60 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 816 nits measured, compared to an unspecified brightness for the ZTE S30 Pro. While the S30 Pro’s display specs are missing, the X60 Pro+'s high peak brightness ensures excellent visibility in direct sunlight. The X60 Pro+ likely utilizes a higher-quality panel, potentially with a higher refresh rate, contributing to a more fluid visual experience. The absence of detailed display information for the S30 Pro suggests it may be a cost-saving measure, potentially impacting color accuracy and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X60 Pro+ is positioned as a camera-centric device, though specific sensor details are missing. The Snapdragon 888’s image signal processor (ISP) is significantly more advanced than the ISP found in the Snapdragon 768G, enabling superior image processing capabilities. The X60 Pro+ likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated optical image stabilization (OIS) system, resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The S30 Pro’s camera system, while capable, will likely fall short in dynamic range and detail compared to the X60 Pro+.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the ZTE S30 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 768G (7nm), while the vivo X60 Pro+ features the Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The 5nm process node of the 888 offers superior transistor density and thermal efficiency compared to the 7nm 768G. This translates to higher sustained performance and less throttling under heavy loads. The X60 Pro+'s CPU, with its Cortex-X1 prime core, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Kryo 475 Prime in the S30 Pro. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences and clock speeds favor the X60 Pro+ in demanding tasks like video editing and high-end gaming.
Battery Life
The vivo X60 Pro+ achieved an endurance rating of 91 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Both devices support 55W wired charging, promising rapid replenishment. However, the more efficient Snapdragon 888 in the X60 Pro+ combined with its larger battery (implied by the endurance rating) likely results in faster overall charging times and longer usage between charges. The S30 Pro, while offering 55W charging, may require more frequent top-ups due to the less efficient chipset and potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE S30 Pro if you need a smooth, responsive experience for everyday tasks and light gaming, and value affordability above all else. It’s a strong contender for users who don’t demand the absolute best in mobile processing. Buy the vivo X60 Pro+ if you prioritize top-tier performance for demanding games and applications, and require a versatile and high-quality camera system for photography and videography. It’s the choice for power users and content creators.