ZTE nubia Z70S Ultra vs. Oppo Find X7: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown

The ZTE nubia Z70S Ultra and Oppo Find X7 represent distinct approaches to the high-end smartphone market. The nubia Z70S Ultra, powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, prioritizes sustained performance and battery efficiency. Conversely, the Oppo Find X7 leverages the MediaTek Dimensity 9300, aiming for peak processing power. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right flagship for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent performance, the ZTE nubia Z70S Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, coupled with a measured 12:52h active use score, provides a more balanced experience than the Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300, which may trade some efficiency for raw speed.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE nubia Z70S Ultra Oppo Find X7
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 661, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, April 282024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 28Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.3 x 77.1 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 3.04 x 0.34 in)162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight228 g (8.04 oz)202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i or Longxi glass (gen 2)Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1216 x 2688 pixels (~431 ppi density)1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density)
Size6.85 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, 2000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 830Immortalis-G720 MC12
OSAndroid 15, Nebula AIOS 1.5Android 14, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDRHasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (standard), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.5, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, multi-directional PDAF (15cm - ∞), OIS, 2.7x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, multi-directional PDAF50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single16 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, under display32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L2+L5), GLONASS (G1+G5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD3.0, QC4100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 6600 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsAntique Brown, Classic BlackBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple
ModelsNX737JPHZ110
Price£ 629.00 / € 729.00About 520 EUR

ZTE nubia Z70S Ultra

  • Exceptional battery life (12:52h active use)
  • Thermally efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
  • High peak display brightness (1395 nits)

  • 80W charging is slower than Oppo’s 100W
  • Camera specs are currently unknown

Oppo Find X7

  • Ultra-fast 100W charging (0-100% in 26 min)
  • Powerful Dimensity 9300 chipset for peak performance
  • Likely excellent display quality (based on Oppo’s history)

  • Potentially shorter battery life due to less efficient chipset
  • Dimensity 9300 may throttle under sustained load

Display Comparison

The nubia Z70S Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1395 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo Find X7’s display specifications aren’t provided, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s image signal processor (ISP) benefits from this brightness, providing better dynamic range in photos and videos. Without knowing the Find X7’s refresh rate or PWM dimming frequency, it’s difficult to assess potential eye strain differences, but the nubia’s high brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for both devices, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP plays a crucial role. The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s ISP is known for its excellent image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300 also features a capable ISP, but its performance will depend on the sensor and lens choices. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes it impossible to determine which phone will deliver superior image quality. We can assume both will offer advanced computational photography features, but the Snapdragon’s proven track record gives the nubia a slight edge.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) versus MediaTek’s Dimensity 9300 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite utilizes a unique octa-core configuration (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) designed for optimized performance and efficiency. The Dimensity 9300, with its Cortex-X4 cores (1x3.25 GHz & 3x2.85 GHz), focuses on raw processing power. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should translate to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions compared to the 4nm Dimensity 9300. This means the nubia Z70S Ultra is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.

Battery Life

The nubia Z70S Ultra’s active use battery score of 12:52h is a significant advantage. While the Oppo Find X7 offers faster charging at 100W (0-100% in 26 minutes) compared to the nubia’s 80W, the nubia’s superior battery life provides more real-world usability. The Oppo’s 100W charging is convenient, reaching 50% in just 10 minutes, but a larger battery capacity and more efficient chipset, as seen in the nubia Z70S Ultra, ultimately deliver a better user experience for those who heavily use their phones.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE nubia Z70S Ultra if you need exceptional battery life for demanding tasks, value sustained performance over short bursts of peak power, and appreciate a more thermally managed device. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prioritize absolute CPU and GPU horsepower for graphically intensive games or applications, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and faster heat build-up in exchange for that performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9300 in the Oppo Find X7 experience significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9300 is a powerful chipset, but its 4nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process. This means the Oppo Find X7 is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates and performance over time. The nubia Z70S Ultra, with its more efficient chipset, is better equipped to maintain sustained performance.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the nubia Z70S Ultra compare to the 100W charging on the Oppo Find X7 in real-world usage?
While the Oppo Find X7 charges faster overall (0-100% in 26 minutes), the nubia Z70S Ultra’s 80W charging is still quite rapid. The difference in charging speed is most noticeable in the initial stages. However, the nubia Z70S Ultra’s superior battery life means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently, mitigating the impact of the slower charging speed.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon CPU cores a significant advantage over the Dimensity 9300’s Cortex-X4 cores?
The Oryon cores in the Snapdragon 8 Elite are designed for a balance of performance and efficiency, focusing on sustained workloads. The Dimensity 9300’s Cortex-X4 cores prioritize peak performance. For tasks like video editing or long gaming sessions, the Oryon cores are likely to provide a smoother, more consistent experience due to better thermal management and power efficiency.