ZTE nubia Z60S Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Performance, Battery, and Display Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a well-rounded experience, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the better choice. Its exceptional 42-hour battery endurance and robust software support outweigh the nubia Z60S Pro’s raw speed advantage. However, gamers and power users will find the nubia’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z60S Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 23 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 12 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Longxi glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 14, MyOS 14 (International), MyOS 14.5 (China) | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 125˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, 10-bit | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L2+L5), GLONASS (G1+G5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aqua, White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | - | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | About 670 EUR | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
ZTE nubia Z60S Pro
- Superior raw processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to efficient chipset
- Battery life is shorter than the S24 FE
- Limited information on camera capabilities
- Samsung ecosystem benefits are absent
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Exceptional 42-hour battery endurance and 2000 charge cycles
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Exynos 2400e performance is lower than Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1372 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the nubia Z60S Pro (brightness data unavailable). While the nubia’s panel specifics are unknown, the S24 FE’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both utilize 4nm chipsets, but the S24 FE’s display technology is a clear win for outdoor visibility. The S24 FE also benefits from Samsung’s well-regarded color calibration, likely offering more accurate colors out of the box.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the nubia Z60S Pro are unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the S24 FE’s camera system is expected to leverage Samsung’s image processing expertise. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown for the nubia, the S24 FE likely benefits from optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the S24 FE is largely a marketing feature and unlikely to provide significant image quality improvements. The focus should be on the main sensor performance and image processing algorithms, where Samsung typically excels.
Performance
The nubia Z60S Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This contrasts with the Galaxy S24 FE’s Exynos 2400e (4nm) 10-core setup. While the Exynos has more cores, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture is generally considered more efficient and delivers superior sustained performance, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. The Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU will outperform the Xclipse GPU in the Exynos, leading to higher frame rates in games. However, the Exynos 2400e’s thermal management will be crucial; potential throttling under sustained load is a concern, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process offers better thermal efficiency.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE’s battery endurance is a standout feature, achieving a remarkable 42 hours of use and supporting 2000 charge cycles, indicating exceptional long-term battery health. In active use, it scores 11:48h. The nubia Z60S Pro, while offering a respectable 12:12h of active use, falls short of the S24 FE’s longevity. The nubia compensates with 80W wired charging, significantly faster than the S24 FE’s 25W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The S24 FE also adds 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging, offering greater convenience, but the nubia’s faster wired charging is ideal for quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z60S Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and prioritize fast charging over extended battery life. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you prefer a balanced smartphone experience with exceptional battery endurance, a brighter display, and the convenience of Samsung’s ecosystem and wireless charging capabilities.