ZTE nubia Z60S Pro vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 14:32h active use battery life and 100W charging, reaching 100% in just 26 minutes, outweigh the nubia Z60S Pro’s slightly faster 80W charging and marginally shorter runtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z60S Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 23 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 12 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Longxi glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, MyOS 14 (International), MyOS 14.5 (China) | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 125˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, 10-bit | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L2+L5), GLONASS (G1+G5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aqua, White | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | - | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 670 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
ZTE nubia Z60S Pro
- Potentially more balanced feature set (based on brand positioning)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides flagship-level performance
- 80W charging is still relatively fast
- Shorter battery life compared to OnePlus 12R
- Limited display brightness information
OnePlus 12R
- Exceptional battery life (14:32h active use)
- Ultra-fast 100W charging (0-100% in 26 minutes)
- Bright display (1181 nits peak brightness)
- Camera specifications are unknown
- May prioritize battery life over other features
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a notably brighter display, peaking at 1181 nits, which translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While the nubia Z60S Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the OnePlus 12R’s high peak brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor use. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels given their market segment, but the OnePlus 12R’s measured brightness provides a concrete advantage.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. The nubia brand often focuses on camera features, but the OnePlus 12R’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded. Without further data, it’s safe to assume both will deliver acceptable image quality, but a definitive winner cannot be determined.
Performance
Both the ZTE nubia Z60S Pro and the OnePlus 12R are powered by the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. However, the OnePlus 12R’s superior thermal management (assumed based on OnePlus’s history with cooling solutions) could allow it to sustain peak performance for longer durations during demanding tasks like gaming. The 4nm process node contributes to improved thermal efficiency in both devices, minimizing throttling.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R clearly excels in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 14:32h compared to the nubia Z60S Pro’s 12:12h. This nearly 2.5-hour difference is substantial for users who heavily utilize their smartphones. Furthermore, the OnePlus 12R’s 100W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 26 minutes, significantly outperforms the nubia Z60S Pro’s 80W charging. This faster charging speed minimizes downtime and provides greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z60S Pro if you need a phone with a more balanced feature set and are willing to trade some battery life for potentially other advantages (not detailed in provided data, but assumed based on brand positioning). Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize all-day battery life, incredibly fast charging, and a consistently smooth experience without constantly reaching for a charger.