Nubia Z60 Ultra vs. iQOO 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Charging, and Performance

Both the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra and the vivo iQOO 12 Pro represent the pinnacle of Android flagship technology, powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. However, they diverge significantly in their approach to battery life and charging speed, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison will dissect these differences, alongside performance nuances, to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing longevity and a balanced experience, the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its impressive 14:57-hour active use battery score, combined with a respectable 80W charging speed, offers a compelling package. The iQOO 12 Pro’s 120W charging is faster, but doesn’t compensate for a potentially shorter runtime.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra vivo iQOO 12 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2023, December 192023, November 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, December 29Available. Released 2023, November 14
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, glass back-
Dimensions164 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight246 g (8.68 oz)205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz)
Display
Resolution1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density)
Size6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, 1500 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, MyOS 14Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDRColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/1.8, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.55", PDAF, OIS50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single12 MP, under display - International model 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display - China model16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD3.0, QC4120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 6000 mAh5100 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Silver, Photographer EditionBlack, Red, White (BMW M branding)
ModelsNX721JV2329A
Price$ 459.00About 650 EUR

ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra

  • Exceptional battery life (14:57h active use)
  • Respectable 80W wired charging
  • High peak brightness (1018 nits)

  • Lacks wireless charging
  • Charging speed slower than iQOO 12 Pro

vivo iQOO 12 Pro

  • Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
  • Convenient 50W wireless charging
  • Potential for optimized gaming performance

  • Likely shorter battery life than nubia Z60 Ultra
  • Battery capacity currently unknown

Display Comparison

While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, the nubia Z60 Ultra’s measured 1018 nits of peak brightness suggests a superior outdoor visibility experience. The iQOO 12 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. However, both are expected to utilize adaptive refresh rate technology (LTPO) to optimize power consumption, though the specific implementation and efficiency will vary. Bezels are likely comparable given the flagship positioning of both devices.

Camera Comparison

Camera specifications are currently limited. Both devices will undoubtedly feature multi-camera systems, but the nubia Z60 Ultra’s potential focus on image quality and detail, given ZTE’s recent camera advancements, is a possibility. The iQOO 12 Pro may lean towards a more versatile camera setup optimized for social media and quick sharing. Without sensor size, aperture, and image processing details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact overall image quality.

Performance

Both the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra and the vivo iQOO 12 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset, featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520). This means raw processing power will be virtually identical. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and RAM optimization. The iQOO series historically focuses on gaming performance, suggesting potentially more aggressive cooling solutions and software tweaks to maintain peak clock speeds for longer durations. However, without detailed thermal testing, this remains speculative.

Battery Life

The nubia Z60 Ultra’s active use battery score of 14:57 hours is a significant advantage. While the iQOO 12 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the nubia’s runtime demonstrates excellent power efficiency. The iQOO 12 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 120W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless – compared to the nubia Z60 Ultra’s 80W wired charging. This means the iQOO 12 Pro can replenish its battery much quicker, potentially mitigating concerns about shorter runtime. The addition of wireless and reverse wireless charging on the iQOO 12 Pro provides added convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use and value a consistently reliable experience. This phone is ideal for professionals, travelers, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day, and are willing to potentially sacrifice some overall runtime.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the iQOO 12 Pro’s 120W charging significantly reduce battery lifespan compared to the nubia Z60 Ultra’s 80W charging?
While faster charging generates more heat, modern charging controllers and battery management systems mitigate the impact on long-term battery health. However, consistently using 120W charging *may* lead to slightly faster degradation compared to the more conservative 80W charging of the nubia Z60 Ultra, though the difference is likely to be minimal for most users.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s thermal performance differ between the nubia Z60 Ultra and the iQOO 12 Pro, and will this impact sustained gaming performance?
Both phones utilize the same chipset, but the iQOO 12 Pro, historically, prioritizes gaming. This suggests a potentially more robust cooling system (vapor chamber, graphite sheets) to maintain peak performance during extended gaming sessions. The nubia Z60 Ultra may prioritize thermal efficiency over sustained peak performance, potentially leading to some throttling under heavy load. Independent thermal testing is required to confirm these differences.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the nubia Z60 Ultra a significant drawback for users accustomed to this convenience?
For users heavily reliant on wireless charging, the absence of this feature on the nubia Z60 Ultra is a notable omission. However, the superior battery life may offset this inconvenience for many, reducing the need for frequent charging altogether. The iQOO 12 Pro’s 50W wireless charging offers a compelling alternative for those who value this functionality.