Nubia Z60 Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: Which Android Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more versatile camera system and established software support, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the better choice. However, the nubia Z60 Ultra offers exceptional battery life and a competitive price point, making it a compelling option for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 19 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 29 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 246 g (8.68 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, 1500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 14, MyOS 14 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/1.8, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.55", PDAF, OIS | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 12 MP, under display - International model 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display - China model | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Photographer Edition | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | NX721J | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | $ 459.00 | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (14:57h active use)
- Faster wired charging (80W)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Lower peak display brightness (1018 nits)
- Limited camera information available
- Less established software support
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Brighter display (1447 nits)
- Versatile and feature-rich camera system
- Established software ecosystem and long-term support
- Slightly shorter battery life (13:49h active use)
- Slower wired charging (45W)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1447 nits compared to the nubia Z60 Ultra’s 1018 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight, where the S24 Ultra maintains superior visibility. While both utilize the efficient 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, the S24 Ultra’s brighter panel will draw slightly more power. The nubia Z60 Ultra’s display specifications don’t mention LTPO, suggesting a potentially less adaptive refresh rate compared to the S24 Ultra, which likely features LTPO for improved efficiency. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, but color accuracy testing would be needed to determine a clear winner in that regard.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the nubia Z60 Ultra lacks specific camera details, making a direct comparison challenging. However, Samsung’s Galaxy S24 Ultra is renowned for its versatile camera system, likely featuring a larger main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The S24 Ultra’s camera excels in both photo and video capture, offering features like 8K video recording and enhanced low-light performance. Without detailed specifications for the nubia Z60 Ultra’s camera, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities, but it’s reasonable to assume the S24 Ultra holds an advantage in overall image quality and feature set. We can safely assume the S24 Ultra will have a more refined computational photography pipeline.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8650-AB/AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), but subtle CPU clock speed differences exist. The S24 Ultra’s CPU peaks at 3.39GHz, slightly higher than the Z60 Ultra’s 3.3 GHz. While this difference is unlikely to be perceptible in most everyday tasks, it could translate to marginally faster performance in sustained, CPU-intensive workloads. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with the same Cortex-X4, A720, and A520 cores. Thermal management will be crucial; the S24 Ultra’s larger chassis may provide better heat dissipation, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM specifications are not provided, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The nubia Z60 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an active use score of 14:57h compared to the S24 Ultra’s 13:49h. This nearly one-hour difference suggests the Z60 Ultra’s optimization or larger battery capacity (not specified) contributes to superior endurance. However, the S24 Ultra compensates with faster charging, reaching 65% charge in 30 minutes with its 45W wired charging, while the Z60 Ultra’s 80W charging is faster overall but lacks the detailed timing information. The S24 Ultra also offers 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent from the provided Z60 Ultra specifications.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra if you need maximum battery endurance, prioritize fast charging speeds, and appreciate a more streamlined Android experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a brighter display, a more polished camera system with extensive features, and the long-term software support and ecosystem integration that Samsung provides.