ZTE nubia Z50S Pro vs OnePlus 11R: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Power and Charging Speed
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the ZTE nubia Z50S Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge and improved thermal efficiency, while the 1029 nits peak brightness provides superior outdoor visibility. However, the OnePlus 11R’s 100W charging is a significant advantage for those who value speed above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z50S Pro | OnePlus 11R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 20 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 27 | Available. Released 2023, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 (719 MHz) | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, MyOS 13, no planned android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, OIS, optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 125˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, 10-bit | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Khaki, Silver/White | Galactic Silver, Sonic Black, Solar Red |
| Models | NX713J | CPH2487 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
ZTE nubia Z50S Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Excellent battery life (12:29h active use)
- Slower charging speed (80W)
- Camera details are currently unknown
OnePlus 11R
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Likely competitive camera performance (based on OnePlus history)
- Strong value proposition
- Less powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The nubia Z50S Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1029 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage over what is typically seen in this price bracket. This translates to excellent readability under direct sunlight. While the OnePlus 11R’s display specs aren’t provided, OnePlus generally utilizes AMOLED panels with good color accuracy. The nubia’s higher peak brightness is a clear win for outdoor users. We expect both to have high refresh rate panels, but the nubia’s brightness gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Context data doesn’t provide detailed camera specifications beyond mentioning 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the nubia Z50S Pro. However, nubia often focuses on camera innovation, and we can anticipate a competitive sensor setup. The OnePlus 11R’s camera specs are also missing, but OnePlus typically delivers solid camera performance with a focus on natural color reproduction. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but nubia’s brand history suggests a potential edge in camera features and image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the nubia Z50S Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 (4nm), while the OnePlus 11R features the SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.36 GHz, represents a substantial architectural upgrade over the 11R’s Cortex-X2 (3.0 GHz). This, combined with refinements in the GPU and NPU, results in faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The 11R’s chipset is still very capable, but the Z50S Pro holds a clear performance advantage.
Battery Life
The nubia Z50S Pro achieves an impressive 12:29h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the OnePlus 11R’s battery capacity is unknown, it compensates with 100W wired charging, significantly faster than the nubia’s 80W. This means the 11R can likely achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes, while the nubia will take longer. The trade-off is endurance versus charging speed; the nubia lasts longer on a single charge, while the 11R gets you back to 100% much faster.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z50S Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value a brighter, more visible display. Buy the OnePlus 11R if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and are willing to trade a small amount of processing power for the convenience of a full charge in under 30 minutes. Both phones offer excellent value, but cater to different priorities.