ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power, faster charging, and gaming capabilities, the ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro excels in computational photography and offers a more polished, integrated software experience, making it ideal for everyday users and photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 07 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 14 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/2.X, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1+L2+L5), GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC4 | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Starry Sky | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | NX712J | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 540 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Potential for gaming-focused features (triggers)
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Camera image processing is less proven than Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography
- Seamless Google software experience
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Less powerful Tensor G2 chipset
- May throttle under sustained heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the nubia Z50 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, nubia typically employs high-quality panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio ensures deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both support PD3.0, but the nubia’s potential for a higher refresh rate (based on nubia’s history) could offer smoother scrolling, though this isn’t confirmed in the provided data. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is a known quantity, delivering a consistently excellent viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as having strong photo/video capabilities, but their approaches differ. The nubia Z50 Ultra’s potential for a higher megapixel count (a common nubia feature) suggests a focus on detail and cropping flexibility. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms for exceptional dynamic range and image processing. While sensor sizes and apertures aren’t specified, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing excels in challenging lighting conditions. The nubia’s hardware advantage *could* translate to better low-light performance if paired with effective software, but the Pixel’s software is a proven winner.
Performance
The nubia Z50 Ultra’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset represents a significant leap in performance and efficiency over the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, outpaces the Pixel’s Cortex-X1 cores (2.85 GHz). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, but falls behind in raw CPU and GPU power. The nubia’s LPDDR5x RAM (assumed, based on flagship specs) further enhances performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the nubia Z50 Ultra’s unspecified mAh capacity. However, the nubia’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, offering significantly faster charging speeds than the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The nubia also supports PD3.0 and QC4, while the Pixel 7 Pro adds 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. The nubia’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z50 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for demanding games, require incredibly fast 80W charging, and appreciate features like dedicated gaming triggers. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, prioritize exceptional camera image processing, and value long-term software support and Google’s AI features.