ZTE nubia Z40 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The nubia Z40 Pro boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and potentially faster charging (depending on the version). However, the Axon 40 Pro offers a more balanced experience with a refined design and potentially better software support. For raw power, the Z40 Pro wins, but the Axon 40 Pro provides a more polished overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z40 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - ROW | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 25 | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 72.9 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 72.9 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.87 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired; 15W magnetic wireless (gravity version) 80W wired (regular version) | 65W wired, PD, QC4 |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5000 mAh (regular version)· Li-Po 4600 mAh (gravity version) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Star Black, Silver | Dream black, Crystal blue, Gold |
| Models | NX701J | A2023G, A2023 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 410 EUR |
ZTE nubia Z40 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Potentially faster charging (80W version)
- High refresh rate display
- Gaming focused
- Software support may be less consistent
- Design may be less refined
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
ZTE Axon 40 Pro
- Balanced performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Excellent camera performance and image processing
- Refined design and build quality
- Good software support
- Slightly slower processor than Z40 Pro
- Slower charging speed
- May not be ideal for hardcore gamers
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz). The nubia Z40 Pro may have a slightly higher resolution or peak brightness, but the Axon 40 Pro's display is known for its color accuracy and viewing angles. Expect vibrant colors and smooth scrolling on both.
Camera Comparison
The Axon 40 Pro is often praised for its camera system, particularly its image processing. While the nubia Z40 Pro has capable cameras, the Axon 40 Pro's software optimization and potentially larger sensor sizes may result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Both likely offer versatile camera setups with ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
The nubia Z40 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a substantial performance advantage over the Axon 40 Pro's Snapdragon 870. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance, especially in demanding titles. The 870 is still a capable chip, but the 8 Gen 1 is in a different league.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have around a 4500-5000 mAh battery. The nubia Z40 Pro's 66W/80W wired charging is faster than the Axon 40 Pro's 65W, allowing for quicker top-ups. Battery life will depend on usage patterns, but both should provide a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Z40 Pro is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance above all else. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro is a great choice for users who want a well-rounded smartphone with a good camera, solid performance, and a more mainstream design.