ZTE nubia Z40 Pro vs. Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X5 Pro emerges as the slightly more refined package. Its superior wireless charging capabilities (50W vs 15/80W) and established camera processing, combined with a comparable endurance rating, make it a more consistently reliable daily driver. However, the nubia Z40 Pro offers a compelling value proposition, particularly the gravity version with 80W wired charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z40 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 25 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 72.9 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (standard), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired; 15W magnetic wireless (gravity version) 80W wired (regular version) | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5000 mAh (regular version)· Li-Po 4600 mAh (gravity version) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Star Black, Silver | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | NX701J | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Z40 Pro
- Potentially faster wired charging (80W gravity version)
- Competitive Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Similar battery endurance to Oppo
- May offer a more affordable price point
- Slower wireless charging (15W/80W)
- Less refined software experience (potentially)
- Limited display details available
- Camera processing may be less consistent
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- Proven camera image processing
- Higher peak display brightness
- Dimensity 9000 variant (China) offers a slight performance boost
- Wired charging is comparable to nubia, not significantly faster
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 9000 variant only available in China
- No detailed information on OIS
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize high-end displays, but specific details beyond the Oppo’s measured 762 nits peak brightness are limited. The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a superior OLED panel. While both likely employ high refresh rates, the nubia Z40 Pro’s potential PWM dimming rate isn’t specified, making the Oppo a safer bet for users sensitive to flicker. The lack of detailed display specs for the nubia hinders a complete assessment, but the Oppo’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The focus should be on image processing. Oppo is known for its natural-looking images, while nubia often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors. Without specific sensor size or aperture details, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely to offer limited utility, serving primarily as marketing features.
Performance
Both phones share the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) in global markets, featuring the same CPU configuration: 1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro has a China-specific variant with the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4nm) boasting slightly higher clock speeds (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710). This suggests a potential performance edge for the Dimensity variant, though real-world differences may be minimal. Thermal management will be crucial given the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s known heat issues, and neither manufacturer details specific cooling solutions.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging capabilities. The Oppo Find X5 Pro excels in charging speed with 80W wired (50% in 12 minutes) and 50W wireless (100% in 47 minutes), plus 10W reverse wireless. The nubia Z40 Pro offers 66W wired (regular version) or 80W (gravity version) and a significantly slower 15W magnetic wireless. The Oppo’s faster wireless charging is a major advantage for users who prefer cable-free power-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z40 Pro if you prioritize raw charging speed (especially the gravity version) and are comfortable with a potentially less polished software experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and demand the fastest possible wired charging. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you value a more balanced experience with excellent wireless charging, a proven camera system, and a refined user interface. This phone suits users who want a premium, hassle-free flagship.