ZTE nubia Z30 Pro vs. Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing blazing-fast charging and a more aggressive performance profile, the ZTE nubia Z30 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro offers a more polished all-around experience with a potentially more efficient chipset (depending on region) and a comparable battery life despite slower charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Z30 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 20 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 25 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 73 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 11, nubia UI 9 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/1.9, 35mm (standard), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 123mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 64 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm | - |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Black, Black/Gold | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | NX667J | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 640 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Z30 Pro
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Aggressive performance profile for demanding tasks
- Older Snapdragon 888 chipset may throttle under sustained load
- Limited information on camera specifications
- Display specs are unknown
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Strong camera system with refined image processing
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities
- Slower wired charging compared to the nubia Z30 Pro
- Potentially higher price point
- Chipset variant (Snapdragon vs Dimensity) impacts performance and efficiency
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, suggesting a vibrant viewing experience, though the nubia Z30 Pro’s display specifications are not provided. Both devices likely employ high-refresh-rate panels, but without specific details on the nubia, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or panel technology (LTPO). The Find X5 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio indicates a strong OLED panel, offering deep blacks and vivid colors. The lack of nubia display specs makes a direct comparison challenging, but the Find X5 Pro appears to have a slight edge in known display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size information or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. The nubia Z30 Pro’s camera system is not detailed, while the Find X5 Pro’s camera is known for its color science and image processing. The absence of information on the nubia’s camera prevents a meaningful assessment of its capabilities against the Find X5 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the nubia Z30 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm), while the Oppo Find X5 Pro features either the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) or the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4nm), depending on the region. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Dimensity 9000 offers improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 5nm Snapdragon 888. The Find X5 Pro’s CPU, with its Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.00/3.05 GHz, provides a performance advantage over the Z30 Pro’s 2.84 GHz Cortex-X1. While the nubia’s 120W charging is a significant advantage, the Find X5 Pro’s chipset offers a more modern architecture and potentially less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the nubia). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The nubia Z30 Pro’s 120W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage over the Find X5 Pro’s 80W wired charging (50% in 12 minutes, 100% likely over 30 minutes). The Find X5 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (100% in 47 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the nubia Z30 Pro. The nubia prioritizes speed, while the Oppo offers more charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Z30 Pro if you are a power user who frequently games, streams, or transfers large files and values the absolute fastest charging speeds available. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you prioritize a well-rounded experience with a strong camera system, a refined design, and potentially better thermal management, especially if you obtain the Dimensity 9000 variant.