ZTE nubia RedMagic Mars vs. OnePlus 7 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Gaming and 5G
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and a well-rounded experience, the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 855 offers a performance edge and faster charging, despite the RedMagic Mars' gaming-focused design. However, gamers on a budget will find the RedMagic Mars a compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia RedMagic Mars | OnePlus 7 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 41 NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, November. Released 2018, December | 2019, May 14. Released 2019, September 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dinorex T2X-1), aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 9.9 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.39 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Dinorex T2X-1 scratch/shock resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Redmagic 1.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0.4 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 10GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 78mm (telephoto), 3x zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS, no video rec. with ultrawide camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3800 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Camouflage | Mirror Grey, Almond, Nebula Blue |
| Models | NX619J | GM1925 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 800 EUR |
ZTE nubia RedMagic Mars
- More affordable price point
- Dedicated gaming focus
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Older Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior camera performance
OnePlus 7 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 855 chipset
- 30W fast charging
- 5G connectivity
- Superior camera system (likely)
- Higher price
- May prioritize balanced performance over raw gaming power
Display Comparison
While both devices feature sizable displays, the specifics aren't provided. However, given the RedMagic Mars' gaming focus, it likely prioritizes a high refresh rate, potentially at the expense of color accuracy. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G, known for its display quality, likely boasts a wider color gamut and higher peak brightness. The 7nm Snapdragon 855 in the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G will generate less heat, potentially leading to more sustained brightness levels without throttling.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a precise comparison. However, OnePlus flagships generally prioritize camera performance, likely featuring larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The RedMagic Mars, focused on gaming, likely features a more basic camera setup. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G likely offers better low-light performance and more versatile shooting modes. The absence of detailed camera information suggests the RedMagic Mars isn't a primary selling point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the RedMagic Mars’ Snapdragon 845 (10nm). The 855’s Kryo 485 cores, with their varying clock speeds (1x2.84 GHz, 3x2.42 GHz, 4x1.78 GHz) offer improved efficiency and performance compared to the 845’s (1x2.8 GHz, 3x2.4 GHz, 4x1.8 GHz). The smaller 7nm process node translates to lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads, benefiting demanding games and applications. The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G will demonstrably outperform the RedMagic Mars in CPU and GPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The RedMagic Mars features 18W wired charging, while the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G boasts a significantly faster 30W wired charging solution. This difference is substantial; the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G will charge from 0-100% considerably faster. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Gamers will appreciate the quicker top-ups offered by the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G between gaming sessions.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic Mars if you need a dedicated gaming phone with a focus on maximizing performance-per-dollar, and are willing to compromise on camera quality and 5G connectivity. Buy the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G if you prefer a more balanced flagship experience with 5G capabilities, faster charging, and a more versatile camera system, even at a higher price.