ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+ vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Gaming and AI
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience with exceptional camera capabilities and smart features, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is the better choice. However, if mobile gaming is your primary focus, the RedMagic 8S Pro+ delivers unmatched performance and cooling, justifying its specialized design.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+ | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 05 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 11 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors (China only), 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 (719 MHz) | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Redmagic OS 8 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm, under display | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 (China), 3.1 (International), OTG, accessory connector, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 165W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 14 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight, Platinum, Aurora | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | - | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 700 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+
- Unmatched gaming performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Blazing-fast 165W charging
- Active cooling system for sustained performance
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 7 Pro
- Software experience less refined than Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Smooth and intuitive software experience with Google’s AI features
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower charging speed compared to RedMagic
- Less powerful chipset for demanding games
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a vibrant display reaching 1090 nits peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even outdoors. While the RedMagic 8S Pro+’s display specs aren’t provided, nubia typically focuses on high refresh rates for gaming. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience for media consumption. The Pixel’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts refresh rates, potentially offering better battery efficiency than a fixed high refresh rate on the RedMagic, though this depends on nubia’s implementation. Bezels are likely slimmer on the Pixel 7 Pro, reflecting Google’s emphasis on a premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s Tensor G2 chip for advanced image processing. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel’s camera system is optimized for dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. The RedMagic 8S Pro+’s camera capabilities are less emphasized, likely prioritizing gaming features. The Pixel’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is crucial for stable video recording and sharp photos in challenging conditions. The RedMagic’s camera is likely adequate, but won’t compete with the Pixel’s image quality and software features.
Performance
The RedMagic 8S Pro+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset is a clear advantage in raw processing power compared to the Google Tensor G2 (5nm) found in the Pixel 7 Pro. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.36 GHz, significantly outperforms the Pixel’s Cortex-X1 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior thermal efficiency, crucial for sustained gaming performance. The RedMagic’s likely inclusion of LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth. While the Tensor G2 excels in AI tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 dominates CPU and GPU benchmarks, translating to higher frame rates and smoother gameplay.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing capacities. However, the RedMagic 8S Pro+’s 165W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 14 minutes. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%, significantly slower. The Pixel 7 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the RedMagic. The RedMagic’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+ if you demand the highest possible frame rates in demanding mobile games, require active cooling for sustained performance, and prioritize raw power over camera versatility. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you value a refined software experience, industry-leading computational photography, and seamless integration with Google’s ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some gaming headroom.