ZTE nubia RedMagic 6s Pro vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Gaming and AI
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For dedicated mobile gamers, the ZTE nubia RedMagic 6s Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset, 120W charging, and gaming-centric features provide an unmatched experience. However, for users prioritizing camera quality, software updates, and a more versatile smartphone experience, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the superior choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia RedMagic 6s Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 06 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 27 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 165Hz, 700 nits (typ) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, Redmagic 4.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 17 min (China) 66W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 65 min (International) | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5050 mAh (Global)· Li-Po 4500 mAh (China only) | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Eclipse Black, Transparent, White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 600 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia RedMagic 6s Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging (China)
- Superior gaming performance with Snapdragon 888+
- Likely higher refresh rate display for smoother gaming
- Lower display brightness compared to Pixel 6 Pro
- Less refined camera system
- Software updates may be less frequent
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and AI-powered features
- Clean and constantly updated Android experience
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful GPU for demanding games
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 846 nits compared to the RedMagic 6s Pro’s 529 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize OLED technology, the Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a more refined panel with deeper blacks. The RedMagic 6s Pro, however, likely features a higher refresh rate (typically 165Hz, though not specified in the data) geared towards smoother gaming visuals, a feature not explicitly highlighted for the Pixel 6 Pro. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size also offers a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t detail camera specifications, but the Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor chip’s AI capabilities. Google’s image processing algorithms are a key differentiator, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. The RedMagic 6s Pro, while likely equipped with a capable camera system, is not positioned as a camera-centric device. The Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode demonstrates a commitment to innovative camera experiences, while the RedMagic prioritizes gaming features. Without specific sensor details, it’s reasonable to assume the Pixel 6 Pro offers a more versatile and refined camera experience.
Performance
Both phones employ an octa-core CPU configuration with Cortex-X1 prime cores, but the underlying chipsets differ drastically. The RedMagic 6s Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm), known for its raw processing power and gaming capabilities. The Pixel 6 Pro, conversely, is powered by Google’s in-house Tensor chip (5nm). While Tensor excels in AI and machine learning tasks – powering features like Live Translate and advanced image processing – the Snapdragon 888+ generally holds an edge in sustained GPU performance. The RedMagic’s focus on gaming likely includes optimized thermal management to minimize throttling under heavy load, a factor not explicitly detailed for the Pixel 6 Pro. Both utilize similar Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, but the clock speeds differ, with the RedMagic’s X1 core running at 3.0 GHz versus the Pixel’s 2.80 GHz.
Battery Life
The RedMagic 6s Pro boasts a significantly faster charging speed – 120W wired (in China) or 66W internationally – capable of fully charging the device in just 17 or 65 minutes respectively. The Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging is considerably slower, taking approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%. However, the Pixel 6 Pro offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the RedMagic. Despite the RedMagic’s faster charging, the Pixel 6 Pro’s endurance rating of 84 hours is higher than the RedMagic’s 97 hours, suggesting more efficient power management despite a smaller battery capacity. This could be attributed to the Tensor chip’s optimized power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic 6s Pro if you demand the highest possible frame rates in demanding mobile games, require incredibly fast charging, and value a dedicated gaming experience with features like shoulder triggers. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prioritize exceptional camera performance, a clean and constantly improving Android experience powered by Google's Tensor chip, and a more balanced smartphone experience with features like Call Screen and Magic Eraser.