ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro vs. Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Gaming, Battery, and Charging

The ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro and Xiaomi 14T Pro represent distinct approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. The RedMagic prioritizes sustained performance and battery endurance for demanding gamers, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro focuses on delivering a well-rounded experience with an emphasis on incredibly fast charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro is the clear winner. Its 20:02 active use score and 1569 nits brightness significantly outperform the Xiaomi 14T Pro. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W charging is unmatched, making it ideal for those who need to top up quickly.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Xiaomi 14T Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, November 032024, September 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, November 13Available. Released 2024, September 26
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X)
Dimensions163.8 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight230 g (8.11 oz)209 g (7.37 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla GlassCorning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1216 x 2688 pixels (~431 ppi density)1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)
Size6.85 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, 1800 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 840Immortalis-G720 MC12
OSAndroid 16, Redmagic OS 11Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLeica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.77", 1.12µm, under display32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG, accessory connector, DisplayPortUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired 80W wireless, 100% in 68 min120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 7500 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMatte Black Cryo, Transparent Silver Subzero, Transparent Black NightfreezeTitan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black
Models-2407FPN8EG
Price€ 698.00 / £ 618.00$ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99
SAR EU-0.99 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)

ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro

  • Exceptional battery life (20:02h active use)
  • Significantly brighter display (1569 nits)
  • More efficient 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset

  • Slower charging speeds compared to Xiaomi (80W wired/wireless)
  • Likely less sophisticated camera system

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (19 min 0-100%)
  • Respectable 50W wireless charging (45 min 0-100%)
  • Potentially superior camera system

  • Shorter battery life (12:32h active use)
  • Less efficient 4nm Dimensity 9300+ chipset

Display Comparison

The ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1569 nits, compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This difference translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the RedMagic’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO) are missing, but the brightness gap is a key differentiator. The RedMagic’s brightness will benefit users who consume a lot of outdoor content.

Camera Comparison

Context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given the RedMagic’s gaming focus, it’s likely the Xiaomi 14T Pro will offer a more sophisticated camera system. Xiaomi typically invests heavily in camera technology, and the 14T Pro is likely to feature a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to excel in photography and videography.

Performance

The chipset choice is a major dividing line. The RedMagic 11 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with Oryon V3 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.6 GHz. This architecture, built on a 3nm process, promises both performance and efficiency. The Xiaomi 14T Pro, conversely, employs the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm). While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chip, the 4nm process is less efficient than the RedMagic’s 3nm node, potentially leading to more thermal throttling under sustained load. The RedMagic’s CPU configuration, with its higher clock speeds, is geared towards maximizing single-core performance, beneficial for many mobile games. The RedMagic’s architecture is likely to provide a more consistent frame rate during long gaming sessions.

Battery Life

The ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro delivers a substantial advantage in battery life, achieving a 20:02 hour active use score. This significantly surpasses the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 12:32 hours. While the Xiaomi 14T Pro compensates with incredibly fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (0-100% in 45 minutes), the RedMagic’s longer runtime is a significant benefit for users who are away from a power source. The RedMagic’s 80W wired and 80W wireless charging are respectable, taking 68 minutes for a full charge, but don’t match the Xiaomi’s speed. The Xiaomi’s charging speed is ideal for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for extended gaming sessions, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and prioritize sustained performance over all else. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prefer a more balanced smartphone experience, value the convenience of the fastest wired and respectable wireless charging, and don't mind a shorter battery life in exchange for quicker power-ups.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the RedMagic 11 Pro throttle under sustained gaming loads?
The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 is designed to mitigate thermal throttling. While some throttling is inevitable, the RedMagic 11 Pro’s advanced cooling system (details not provided in context) combined with the efficient chipset should result in more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro.
❓ How does the 120W charging of the Xiaomi 14T Pro affect battery health over the long term?
While 120W charging is incredibly fast, Xiaomi incorporates technologies to minimize battery degradation. However, consistently utilizing ultra-fast charging *can* contribute to slightly faster battery wear over several years compared to slower charging methods. The Xiaomi 14T Pro likely includes charging safeguards to mitigate this effect.
❓ Is the difference in battery life between the two phones noticeable in everyday use, or only during heavy gaming?
The 7+ hour difference in active use scores is substantial and will be noticeable in everyday use, not just during gaming. Users of the Xiaomi 14T Pro will likely need to charge their device more frequently, even with moderate usage, while the RedMagic 11 Pro offers significantly more peace of mind.