The ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China) and the Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent distinct approaches to the high-end smartphone market. The RedMagic prioritizes unadulterated gaming performance, while the Find X7 Ultra aims for a more balanced, premium experience with a focus on camera capabilities. This comparison dissects their core differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For dedicated mobile gamers, the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro emerges as the winner, thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and likely superior thermal design. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra provides a more refined all-around experience with its faster charging, brighter display, and longer battery life in active use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 17 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2688 pixels (~431 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.85 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, 2000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, Redmagic OS 11 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS
50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.77", 1.12µm, under display | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG, accessory connector, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min
50W wireless
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | NX809J | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | $ 546.64 |
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)
- Potentially superior sustained gaming performance due to 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Likely advanced cooling system for thermal management
- Gaming-focused features (triggers, software optimizations)
- Battery life may be shorter than the Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Camera performance likely secondary to gaming
- Charging speed slower than Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Longer battery life (12:47h active use)
- Faster charging (100W wired, 50W wireless)
- Brighter display (1165 nits)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 may throttle more under sustained load
- Less focused on gaming-specific features
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the RedMagic 11 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While the RedMagic likely features a high refresh rate panel geared towards gaming, the Find X7 Ultra’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor usability. The Find X7 Ultra’s panel technology is likely LTPO, enabling variable refresh rates for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the RedMagic.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is expected to excel in camera performance, though specific sensor details are missing. Its brand reputation suggests a sophisticated camera system with advanced image processing. The RedMagic 11 Pro, while likely including a capable camera, is positioned as a gaming phone, meaning camera quality is a secondary consideration. Without detailed sensor information for the RedMagic, it’s safe to assume the Find X7 Ultra will offer a more versatile and higher-quality photographic experience.
Performance
The core battle lies in the chipsets. The RedMagic 11 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm), featuring a unique Oryon V3 Phoenix CPU architecture (2x4.6 GHz + 6x3.62 GHz). This contrasts with the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with its Cortex-X4 prime core (3.3 GHz). The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 *should* offer better power efficiency and thermal headroom, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance during extended gaming sessions. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is still a formidable opponent, and the difference in real-world gaming performance may be less pronounced than the architectural differences suggest. The RedMagic’s focus on gaming likely includes optimized RAM configurations (likely LPDDR5x) and a more aggressive cooling system.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 12:47h of active use. The RedMagic 11 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its focus on high performance suggests it may prioritize raw power over longevity. The Find X7 Ultra also offers significantly faster charging with 100W wired (0-100% in 26 minutes, 50% in 10 minutes), 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless charging, while the RedMagic 11 Pro is limited to 80W wired charging. This charging versatility gives the Find X7 Ultra a substantial edge for users who need quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro if you demand the absolute highest frame rates in mobile games, prioritize cooling performance, and are willing to trade off some camera and battery life for that edge. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you value a versatile camera system, a brighter and more color-accurate display, faster charging speeds (including wireless), and a more polished software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the RedMagic 11 Pro significantly outperform the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in gaming?
While the 3nm process and Oryon CPU architecture of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 *should* provide a performance advantage, the real-world difference may be marginal. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is still a top-tier chipset, and optimizations in the Find X7 Ultra’s software could close the gap. The RedMagic’s advantage will likely be most noticeable in sustained gaming sessions where thermal management is crucial.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compare to the 80W charging on the RedMagic 11 Pro in practical terms?
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 100W charging is demonstrably faster, achieving a 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 26 minutes. The RedMagic 11 Pro’s 80W charging will take longer for both partial and full charges. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the RedMagic 11 Pro a major drawback?
For users who rely on wireless charging for convenience, the absence of this feature on the RedMagic 11 Pro is a notable omission. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra offers 50W wireless charging, providing a convenient alternative to wired charging.
