ZTE nubia Red Magic 7S Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro offers a more balanced experience with a brighter display, wireless charging, and a slightly more refined design. However, the Red Magic 7S Pro boasts significantly faster wired charging and a more aggressive gaming-focused aesthetic. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: gaming dominance or all-around usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 7S Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International, China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 11 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 77.1 x 10 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.39 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (520Hz touch-sensing) Built-in cooling fan Aviation aluminum middle frame | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors (China only), 120Hz, 600 nits | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Redmagic 5.5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM, 1TB 18GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), under display | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), under display | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 135W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min (China) 65W wired, PD3.0 (International) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian, Supernova, Mercury, Yellow | Black, White |
| Models | NX709S | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 780 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 7S Pro
- Blazing-fast 135W charging (China) / 65W (International)
- Aggressive gaming-focused design
- Potentially superior cooling for sustained performance
- High refresh rate display
- Design may not appeal to everyone
- Camera details are unclear
- International version has slower charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter display (1059 nits)
- Wireless charging
- Excellent battery life (99h endurance rating)
- More mainstream design
- Slower wired charging compared to Red Magic 7S Pro (China)
- Cooling system may not be as robust as Red Magic 7S Pro
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Red Magic 7S Pro's display is good, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The Poco F5 Pro also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. Both use AMOLED panels with high refresh rates, ensuring smooth visuals.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a bit of a mystery as detailed camera specs are missing. Both are listed as 'Photo / Video', suggesting standard camera setups. We'd expect decent image quality from both, but neither is likely to be a photography powerhouse. Real-world testing would be needed to determine a clear winner.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, so raw performance is largely comparable. However, the Red Magic 7S Pro's cooling system is likely more robust, potentially allowing it to sustain peak performance for longer periods during intense gaming sessions. The slight CPU clock speed differences are unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Red Magic 7S Pro, while not explicitly stating an endurance rating, benefits from its incredibly fast 135W wired charging (in China) or 65W (International), allowing for rapid top-ups. Wireless charging is a bonus on the Poco F5 Pro.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 7S Pro is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers who prioritize raw performance, aggressive cooling, and lightning-fast charging. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a better choice for users seeking a well-rounded flagship experience with a vibrant display, wireless charging, and a more mainstream design, while still offering excellent performance.