ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT edges out the Red Magic 7 Pro thanks to its faster 120W charging and slightly more refined software experience. However, the Red Magic 7 Pro’s superior cooling system and dedicated gaming features make it a strong contender for hardcore mobile gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International, China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 17 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 28 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 77.1 x 10 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.39 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (500Hz touch-sensing) Built-in cooling fan Aviation aluminum middle frame | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors (China only), 120Hz, 600 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Redmagic 5.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.22µm, under display | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 135W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 15 min (China) 65W wired, PD3.0 (Global) | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Obsidian, Pulsar, Supernova | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | NX709J | 21121210G |
| Price | About 800 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 64h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1056511(v9) GeekBench: 3845 (v5.1) GFXBench: 77fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 Pro
- Superior cooling system
- Dedicated gaming triggers
- Larger display
- Excellent endurance rating
- Slower charging (global version)
- Less refined software
- Camera performance is average
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Faster charging (120W)
- More refined software experience
- Slightly more compact design
- Good performance
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
- Less emphasis on dedicated gaming features
- Average camera performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate and a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Red Magic 7 Pro has a slightly larger 6.8-inch display, offering a more immersive gaming experience. The Poco F4 GT’s display is a bit more color-accurate out of the box. Both are excellent, but the size advantage goes to the Red Magic.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable on both devices. Both offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggle a bit in low light. Neither phone excels in photography, as gaming is their primary focus. Expect standard photo and video capabilities.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, both phones deliver blistering performance. However, the Red Magic 7 Pro’s advanced cooling system allows it to sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling, crucial for extended gaming sessions. The Poco F4 GT might show slight throttling under prolonged heavy load.
Battery Life
The Poco F4 GT boasts a larger battery and significantly faster charging (120W vs 65W global version of the Red Magic 7 Pro). While the Red Magic 7 Pro has a slightly better endurance rating on paper (64h vs 81h), the Poco F4 GT's faster charging makes up for it, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 Pro is ideal for serious mobile gamers who prioritize cooling, dedicated gaming features like shoulder triggers, and a larger display. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is a better choice for those seeking a more well-rounded experience with faster charging and a slightly more mainstream design, while still offering excellent gaming performance.