ZTE Red Magic 6s Pro vs Red Magic 6: The Ultimate Gaming Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Red Magic 6s Pro offers a noticeable performance boost thanks to the Snapdragon 888+ and significantly faster charging. However, the Red Magic 6 remains a compelling option, especially for those seeking a more budget-friendly entry into the high-end gaming space. The 6s Pro is the clear winner for performance and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 06 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (450Hz touch-sensing) Sliding trigger on the back Built-in cooling fan RGB Light | Pressure sensitive zones (400Hz touch-sensing) Built-in cooling fan | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 165Hz, 700 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, 630 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Redmagic 4.5 | Android 11, Redmagic 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.1, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 17 min (China) 66W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 65 min (International) | 66W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 38 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5050 mAh, non-removable - International modelLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable - China model | Li-Po 5050 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Eclipse Black, Transparent, White | Eclipse Black, Aurora |
| Models | - | NX669J |
| Price | About 600 EUR | $ 890.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 97h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -21.4 LUFS (Excellent) | -21.4 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 758329 (v8), 870708 (v9) GeekBench: 14612 (v4.4), 3664 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 708853 (v8) GeekBench: 3586 (v5.1) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 888+ Chip
- 120W Charging (China) / 66W Charging (International)
- Slightly Improved Performance
- Excellent Cooling System
- Large 5000mAh Battery
- Higher Price
- Camera Performance is Average
- Design is Similar to Red Magic 6
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6
- More Affordable
- Large 5000mAh Battery
- Excellent Cooling System
- Smooth 120Hz Display
- Good Performance for the Price
- Slower Charging Speed
- Snapdragon 888 is Less Powerful
- Camera Performance is Average
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.81-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 240Hz touch sampling rate, ensuring smooth visuals and responsive gameplay. The contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' (nominal), indicating excellent black levels and vibrant colors. While both are excellent, the 6s Pro *might* have slightly improved color calibration, but it's a marginal difference.
Camera Comparison
The Red Magic series has never prioritized camera quality. Both phones feature a triple-camera setup, typically including a main sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. Image quality is decent in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light. The 6s Pro *may* have slightly improved image processing, but the difference is minimal. Video recording capabilities are similar on both.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888+ in the 6s Pro provides a tangible performance advantage over the Snapdragon 888 in the Red Magic 6. Expect smoother frame rates in demanding games, faster app loading times, and improved multitasking capabilities. The 6s Pro's CPU clock speeds are also higher, contributing to the overall performance boost. Cooling systems are robust on both, but the 6s Pro's might be slightly more effective due to the improved chip.
Battery Life
The Red Magic 6s Pro boasts a significant advantage in charging speed, with 120W wired charging (in China) or 66W (International) compared to the Red Magic 6's 66W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times. Both phones have a large 5000mAh battery, but the 6s Pro's improved efficiency, thanks to the Snapdragon 888+, allows for slightly better battery life, though both offer excellent endurance.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers who demand the absolute best performance and lightning-fast charging. If you prioritize raw power and don't mind spending a bit more, the 6s Pro is the way to go. The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 is a great choice for gamers on a tighter budget who still want a premium gaming experience with a powerful processor and a large display. It offers excellent value for money.