ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro vs Infinix Zero Ultra: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Red Magic 6s Pro offers superior gaming performance thanks to its Snapdragon 888+ and dedicated cooling system. However, the Infinix Zero Ultra's 180W charging is unmatched, delivering incredibly fast top-ups. Choose the Red Magic for gaming, the Zero Ultra for charging convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro | Infinix Zero Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/75 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 06 | 2022, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 27 | Available. Released 2022, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 165.5 x 74.5 x 8.8 mm - Coslight Silver165.5 x 75.1 x 9.2 mm - Genesis Noir |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (450Hz touch-sensing) Sliding trigger on the back Built-in cooling fan RGB Light | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 165Hz, 700 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Redmagic 4.5 | Android 12, XOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, (macro) | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF 2 MP |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 17 min (China) 66W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 65 min (International) | 180W wired, 100% in 12 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5050 mAh, non-removable - International modelLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable - China model | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Eclipse Black, Transparent, White | Coslight Silver, Genesis Noir |
| Models | - | X6820 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 97h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -21.4 LUFS (Excellent) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 758329 (v8), 870708 (v9) GeekBench: 14612 (v4.4), 3664 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro
- Exceptional gaming performance
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Dedicated cooling system
- High refresh rate display
- Long battery life (endurance)
- Camera performance may be average
- Design may not appeal to everyone
- International charging speed slower
Infinix Zero Ultra
- Incredibly fast 180W charging
- Vibrant AMOLED display (expected)
- Sleek design
- Competitive price
- Performance not as strong as Red Magic
- Camera details limited
- Software support potentially less robust
Display Comparison
Both phones feature impressive displays. The Red Magic 6s Pro boasts a high refresh rate (likely 120Hz or 165Hz, based on typical Red Magic models) for smooth gaming visuals and a high contrast ratio. The Infinix Zero Ultra is expected to have an AMOLED display with vibrant colors and deep blacks. While specific brightness and resolution details are needed for a definitive comparison, both offer a visually appealing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Infinix Zero Ultra are somewhat limited. However, it is expected to have a high-resolution main sensor. The Red Magic 6s Pro typically prioritizes gaming over camera quality, so expect a decent but not exceptional camera setup. A detailed camera comparison would require sample photos and video tests.
Performance
The Red Magic 6s Pro's Snapdragon 888+ is a significant advantage. It's a flagship-level chipset designed for demanding tasks and gaming. The Infinix Zero Ultra's Dimensity 920 is a capable mid-range processor, but it won't match the raw power of the Snapdragon 888+. Expect smoother gameplay and faster app loading times on the Red Magic.
Battery Life
While the Red Magic 6s Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating (97h), the Infinix Zero Ultra's 180W charging is the real game-changer. It can fully charge from 0% in around 12 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. The Red Magic's 120W charging (international version) is still fast, but not in the same league.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro is ideal for mobile gamers who prioritize performance and a dedicated gaming experience. The Infinix Zero Ultra is perfect for users who value incredibly fast charging and don't want to be tethered to a wall outlet.