ZTE Red Magic 6R vs 6s Pro: The Ultimate Gaming Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Red Magic 6s Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster charging speed, a slightly improved chipset, and longer battery life. While the 6R is a capable device, the 6s Pro's upgrades make it the superior choice for serious mobile gamers, justifying its higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2021, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 02 | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.3 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 169.9 x 77.2 x 9.5 mm (6.69 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (400Hz touch-sensing) | Pressure sensitive zones (450Hz touch-sensing) Sliding trigger on the back Built-in cooling fan RGB Light | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 770 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 165Hz, 700 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Redmagic 4.0 | Android 11, Redmagic 4.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, PD3.0, QC4 (China) 30W wired, PD3.0, QC4 (International) | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 17 min (China) 66W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 65 min (International) |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5050 mAh, non-removable - International modelLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable - China model |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mercury Silver, Light Blue | Eclipse Black, Transparent, White |
| Models | NX666J | - |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 76h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.9 LUFS (Good) | -21.4 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 708156 (v8) | 823354 (v9) GeekBench: 3486 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 758329 (v8), 870708 (v9) GeekBench: 14612 (v4.4), 3664 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R
- More affordable
- Solid Snapdragon 888 performance
- Large, high-refresh-rate display
- Good cooling system
- Slower charging
- Shorter battery life
- Camera not exceptional
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6s Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 888+ performance
- Blazing-fast charging (120W)
- Longer battery life
- Improved color calibration (potentially)
- More expensive
- Similar camera performance to 6R
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate and a 360Hz touch sampling rate, delivering a smooth and responsive gaming experience. The contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' which is a nominal value, indicating excellent contrast. While both are excellent, the 6s Pro's slightly improved color calibration might offer a marginally better visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two. Both feature a triple-camera setup, likely with a primary sensor around 64MP. Image quality is decent for a gaming phone, but not a primary strength. The 6s Pro might have slightly improved image processing due to software optimizations, but the difference is unlikely to be substantial.
Performance
The Red Magic 6s Pro holds a distinct advantage here. While both utilize the Snapdragon 888, the 6s Pro features the 'Plus' variant, offering a slight CPU clock speed boost (3.0 GHz vs 2.84 GHz on the X1 core). This translates to marginally better performance in demanding games and multitasking scenarios. Both phones have ample RAM (typically 8GB or 12GB) and storage, ensuring smooth operation.
Battery Life
The Red Magic 6s Pro shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 97h significantly surpasses the 6R's 76h. Coupled with its vastly superior charging speeds (120W vs 55W/66W), the 6s Pro offers significantly longer gaming sessions and much faster recharge times.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R is ideal for budget-conscious gamers who still want a powerful Snapdragon 888 and a large display. The Red Magic 6s Pro is for those who demand the absolute best performance, lightning-fast charging, and extended battery life, and are willing to pay a premium.