ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R vs Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 Pro emerges as the overall winner thanks to its faster charging, brighter display, and excellent battery life. While the Red Magic 6R boasts a flagship Snapdragon 888 chip, the Poco X5 Pro offers a more well-rounded experience for most users at a competitive price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 27 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.3 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (400Hz touch-sensing) | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 770 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Redmagic 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, PD3.0, QC4 (China) 30W wired, PD3.0, QC4 (International) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Mercury Silver, Light Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | NX666J | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 76h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.9 LUFS (Good) | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 708156 (v8) | 823354 (v9) GeekBench: 3486 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 531398 (v9) GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R
- Flagship Snapdragon 888 processor
- Gaming-focused features (cooling system)
- Potentially better sustained performance in demanding games
- Slower charging speeds
- Lower battery life
- Less bright display
- Camera performance not exceptional
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 67W charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Longer battery life
- Reverse wired charging
- Slightly less powerful processor than Red Magic 6R
- Camera might not be as consistent as higher-end phones
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 912 nits, offering significantly better visibility in sunlight compared to the Red Magic 6R. Both phones have a nominal infinite contrast ratio, but the Poco X5 Pro's brightness advantage is undeniable. The Red Magic 6R's display is still good, but lacks the punch of the Poco X5 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two, as both are listed as 'Photo / Video' without specific details. However, based on general reviews, the Poco X5 Pro tends to offer slightly better image processing and more consistent results. The Red Magic 6R's camera is adequate, but not a standout feature.
Performance
The Red Magic 6R's Snapdragon 888 provides a noticeable performance edge in demanding tasks and games. While the Poco X5 Pro's Snapdragon 778G is no slouch, the 888 offers superior raw power. However, real-world differences might be subtle for everyday use.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 Pro dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 113h, significantly higher than the Red Magic 6R's 76h. Furthermore, the Poco X5 Pro's 67W charging is incredibly fast, reaching 100% in just 45 minutes, while the Red Magic 6R's charging speeds are slower (30W internationally). The Poco X5 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers who prioritize raw processing power and don't mind sacrificing some features. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is a fantastic choice for users seeking a balance of performance, features, and affordability, especially those who value fast charging and a vibrant display.