ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Gaming Phone Battle

The mobile gaming scene is booming, and these two phones – the ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R and the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT – are built to deliver. Both pack powerful processors and gaming-centric features, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco F4 GT takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging (120W!), newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, and slightly better overall performance. While the Red Magic 6R offers impressive battery life, the Poco's speed and power make it the superior choice for serious mobile gamers.

PHONES
Phone Names	ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 4, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G bands	1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE-A, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1x	-

Launch
Announced	2021, May 27	2022, April 26
Status	Available. Released 2021, June 02	Available. Released 2022, April 28

Body
Build	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, glass back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame
Dimensions	163 x 75.3 x 7.8 mm (6.42 x 2.96 x 0.31 in)	162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)
SIM	Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	186 g (6.56 oz)	210 g (7.41 oz)
	Pressure sensitive zones (400Hz touch-sensing)	Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 770 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)	Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPU	Adreno 660	Adreno 730
OS	Android 11, Redmagic 4.0	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama	Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)	-
Single	16 MP, (wide)	20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm
Triple	-	64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)
Video	8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	HDR
Single	16 MP, (wide)	20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	-	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
	32-bit/384kHz audio	24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, aptX, LE	5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	Yes (market/region dependent)	Yes
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	55W wired, PD3.0, QC4 (China) 30W wired, PD3.0, QC4 (International)	120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min
Type	Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable	Li-Po 4700 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Mercury Silver, Light Blue	Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow
Models	NX666J	21121210G
Price	About 500 EUR	€ 227.11 / £ 339.99
SAR	-	1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	Endurance rating 76h	Endurance rating 81h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-27.9 LUFS (Good)	-27.4 LUFS (Good)
Performance	AnTuTu: 708156 (v8) \| 823354 (v9) GeekBench: 3486 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)	AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1)

ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R

Excellent battery life
Responsive display
Gaming-focused features (shoulder triggers)
Generally more affordable

Older chipset (Snapdragon 888)
Slower charging
Camera performance is average

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
Blazing-fast 120W charging
Potentially better camera system
Premium build quality

Higher price
Battery life slightly less than Red Magic 6R
Can run hotter under sustained load

Display Comparison

Both phones boast 'infinite' contrast ratio displays (likely AMOLED), but the Poco F4 GT likely has a higher refresh rate and potentially better color accuracy, though specific details are missing. The Red Magic 6R's display is known for its responsiveness, crucial for gaming. Expect vibrant colors and smooth visuals on both, but the Poco might edge out in overall quality.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are vague for both, simply listed as 'Photo / Video'. However, based on general knowledge, the Poco F4 GT likely has a more versatile and higher-resolution camera system. The Red Magic 6R's camera is adequate, but not a primary selling point.

Performance

The Poco F4 GT's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a clear winner here. It's built on a newer 4nm process and offers a significant performance boost over the Red Magic 6R's Snapdragon 888. Expect faster load times, smoother gameplay, and better multitasking on the Poco. The Red Magic 6R is still capable, but the Poco has the edge.

Battery Life

The Red Magic 6R boasts an impressive endurance rating of 76h, slightly surpassing the Poco F4 GT's 81h. However, the Poco F4 GT's 120W charging blows the Red Magic 6R's 55W (International) charging out of the water. While the Red Magic 6R lasts longer on a single charge, the Poco can be fully charged in just 17 minutes.

Buying Guide

The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6R is ideal for gamers prioritizing long battery life and a more budget-friendly price. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is perfect for those who demand the absolute fastest performance, lightning-fast charging, and are willing to spend a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for demanding games like Genshin Impact?

The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the better choice due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, which will provide smoother gameplay and higher frame rates.

❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?

The Poco F4 GT charges from 0% to 100% in approximately 17 minutes with its 120W charger, while the Red Magic 6R (International version) takes significantly longer, around 1 hour and 15 minutes with its 55W charger.