ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S vs Oppo Reno8 T 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Red Magic 5S is the clear winner for gamers, boasting a Snapdragon 865 and superior cooling. However, the Reno8 T 5G offers a more balanced experience with faster charging and a sleeker design, making it a better choice for everyday users prioritizing style and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 28 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, August 01 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 78 x 9.8 mm (6.64 x 3.07 x 0.39 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Pressure sensitive zones (300Hz touch-sensing) Built-in cooling fan | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.65 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, Redmagic 3.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP, (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, 56% in 15 min, 100% in 40 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Pulse | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | - | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 540 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 83h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 557056 (v8) GeekBench: 13400 (v4.4), 3386 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
- Exceptional gaming performance
- High refresh rate display
- Excellent battery life
- Advanced cooling system
- Less versatile camera
- Bulky design
- May lack some software features
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Fast charging (67W)
- Stylish design
- Versatile camera system
- Good all-around performance
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower refresh rate than Red Magic 5S
- May not be ideal for hardcore gamers
Display Comparison
The Red Magic 5S features a large 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate, optimized for smooth gaming visuals. The Reno8 T 5G has a 6.43-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. While both offer vibrant colors, the Red Magic 5S's higher refresh rate provides a noticeable advantage in fast-paced games. The Red Magic 5S also boasts a higher touch sampling rate.
Camera Comparison
The Reno8 T 5G likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a dedicated ultrawide lens and macro lens, which are absent in the Red Magic 5S. While the Red Magic 5S has a capable camera, the Reno8 T 5G's image processing and software features are likely more refined for general photography. Expect better low-light performance from the Reno8 T 5G.
Performance
Here's where the Red Magic 5S truly shines. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695. This translates to smoother gameplay, faster app loading times, and better overall performance in demanding tasks. The Reno8 T 5G is still capable for everyday use, but it won't handle intensive gaming as well.
Battery Life
The Red Magic 5S boasts an impressive endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is significantly faster than the Red Magic 5S's 55W, allowing for quicker top-ups. While the Red Magic 5S likely has a larger battery capacity, the Reno8 T 5G's faster charging compensates for it.
Buying Guide
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S is ideal for hardcore mobile gamers who demand top-tier performance and advanced gaming features. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is perfect for users seeking a stylish, reliable phone with good battery life, fast charging, and a versatile camera system for everyday photography.