The mid-range smartphone market is heating up, and the Realme GT Neo 5 240W and ZTE nubia Neo 3 represent two distinct approaches to delivering value. The Realme prioritizes sheer speed with its groundbreaking 240W charging, while the nubia Neo 3 focuses on sustained performance and battery life. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner. Its 240W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 10 minutes. However, users who value extended battery life and a more efficient chipset will find the ZTE nubia Neo 3 a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.63 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~386 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.9 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
Bypass Charging | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh or 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Shadow Black, Cyber Silver, Titanium Gold | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | Z2464N | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 60:37h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
ZTE nubia Neo 3
- Exceptional battery endurance (60:37h)
- Long battery lifespan (800 charge cycles)
- More efficient Unisoc T8300 chipset
- Slow 33W charging
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging (100% in 10 minutes)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially shorter battery lifespan
- Higher power consumption
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided in the context data. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that both devices likely feature LCD panels. The Realme GT Neo 5, being a slightly more premium offering, may have a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate. The nubia Neo 3, focusing on value, likely prioritizes efficiency over display extravagance. Bezels are expected to be similar, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme GT Neo 5, positioned as a more feature-rich device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system. The Unisoc T8300’s ISP capabilities are likely less advanced than the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s, potentially resulting in less detailed images and slower processing times. We can assume both phones will have a standard multi-camera setup, but the Realme is expected to deliver superior image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W leverages the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz. This architecture delivers substantially higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the ZTE nubia Neo 3’s Unisoc T8300 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s 4nm process node also provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during demanding tasks like gaming. The nubia Neo 3’s Cortex-A78 cores, while capable, are outmatched by the Snapdragon’s more advanced architecture. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the Realme’s chipset.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s headline feature is its 240W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in just 10 minutes. This is a massive advantage for users who frequently find themselves with low battery. The ZTE nubia Neo 3, with its 33W charging, takes considerably longer to fully charge. However, the nubia Neo 3 boasts a reported 60:37h endurance rating and 800 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health and longevity. While the Realme offers speed, the nubia Neo 3 prioritizes sustained performance and battery lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Neo 3 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of moderate to heavy use, and appreciate the longevity of a battery rated for 800 charge cycles. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize minimizing downtime and need the fastest possible charging speeds, even if it means potentially shorter battery lifespan and higher power consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s charging generate excessive heat?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, Realme has implemented technologies to mitigate heat generation. The device utilizes a dedicated charging chip and optimized charging protocols to maintain safe temperatures during the charging process. However, some warmth is expected during rapid charging.
❓ Is the Unisoc T8300 in the ZTE nubia Neo 3 capable of handling demanding games?
The Unisoc T8300 can handle many popular games, but it will likely require lower graphics settings for optimal performance. It’s not designed for the highest-end gaming experiences, but it’s sufficient for casual and moderate gaming.
❓ How does the 800 charge cycle rating of the nubia Neo 3 translate to real-world usage?
800 charge cycles represent the number of full charge-discharge cycles the battery can endure before significant degradation. This suggests the nubia Neo 3’s battery will maintain a substantial portion of its original capacity for a longer period compared to devices with lower cycle ratings.
