The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro and ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Civi 4 Pro aims for a refined, all-around experience with a flagship-adjacent chipset, while the nubia Neo 3 GT prioritizes gaming performance and rapid charging at a potentially lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset offers superior processing power and efficiency, translating to smoother multitasking and better long-term performance. However, gamers on a budget will find the nubia Neo 3 GT a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2024, March 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.2 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 3.04 x 0.32 in) | 157.2 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm or 7.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 177.6 or 179.3 g or 180.9 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~386 ppi density) | 1236 x 2750 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, HDR10+, BT.2020, 10-bit video, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired
Bypass Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 40 minutes |
| Type | 6000 mAh or 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Electro Yellow, Interstellar Gray, White | Black, Pink, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24053PY09C |
| Price | € 249.00 | About 380 EUR |
ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT
- Faster 80W charging for quick top-ups
- Dedicated gaming focus with potential for optimized software
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Unisoc T9100 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Likely less efficient, leading to more heat and throttling
- Camera performance may be compromised
Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset for smoother performance
- Superior power efficiency for longer battery life and less throttling
- Advanced ISP for better camera image quality
- Slower 67W charging compared to nubia Neo 3 GT
- Potentially higher price point
- Less focused on dedicated gaming features
Display Comparison
While specific display specs are missing, the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro likely benefits from a more advanced panel given its positioning. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP supports higher refresh rates and more sophisticated display technologies. The nubia Neo 3 GT, geared towards gaming, will likely prioritize a high refresh rate, but may compromise on color accuracy or peak brightness. Bezels are expected to be similar on both, targeting a modern look.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ISP is known for its advanced image processing capabilities, suggesting the Civi 4 Pro will likely deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The nubia Neo 3 GT will likely focus on delivering acceptable camera performance at a lower cost, potentially sacrificing features like OIS or larger sensor sizes. We can expect the Civi 4 Pro to offer more versatile camera modes and better video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant step up from the ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT’s Unisoc T9100 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, meaning less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core (3.0 GHz) also provides a substantial performance advantage over the nubia’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.7 GHz). The Civi 4 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, while the nubia’s RAM specification is unknown but likely LPDDR4x, creating a performance gap.
Battery Life
The nubia Neo 3 GT’s 80W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising significantly faster top-ups compared to the Civi 4 Pro’s 67W charging (0-100% in 40 minutes). While battery capacity is unknown for both, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Civi 4 Pro, providing comparable real-world battery life. The nubia’s bypass charging feature is also a plus for gamers, allowing the phone to be powered directly from the charger during gameplay, reducing heat and preserving battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Neo 3 GT if you need a dedicated gaming phone with extremely fast 80W charging and are willing to accept potential compromises in sustained performance and camera quality. Buy the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro if you prefer a more polished, versatile smartphone experience with a more powerful processor, potentially better camera capabilities, and a more refined software experience, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T9100 in the nubia Neo 3 GT struggle with sustained gaming performance?
The Unisoc T9100, while capable, is built on a 6nm process, which is less efficient than the 4nm process used in the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. This means the nubia Neo 3 GT is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, leading to reduced frame rates and performance over time. While it can handle most games, it won't maintain peak performance as consistently as the Civi 4 Pro.
❓ How much of a difference will the 13W charging speed difference make in real-world use between the Civi 4 Pro and Neo 3 GT?
The 13W difference is substantial. The nubia Neo 3 GT’s 80W charging will significantly reduce charging times, especially for quick top-ups. While the Civi 4 Pro’s 67W charging is still fast, the nubia will likely gain a 20-30% speed advantage in charging from 0-100%. This is a key benefit for users who frequently need to recharge their phones quickly.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Civi 4 Pro powerful enough to handle demanding games at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is a very capable chipset. It's designed to deliver flagship-level performance in most scenarios, including demanding games. You should be able to run most popular titles at high or even maximum settings with smooth frame rates. The 4nm process and efficient architecture also help to minimize heat and maintain consistent performance.
