Google Pixel 7a vs. ZTE nubia Focus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly better performance, and its camera system is in a different league. While the nubia Focus offers a potentially more efficient processor, the Pixel 7a’s overall experience is more polished and capable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Focus | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 28 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, Q2 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.9 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 205.5 g (7.27 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz (90Hz - LATAM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) or 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W or 33W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Coral | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | Z2455 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
ZTE nubia Focus
- Superior camera performance with Google’s computational photography.
- Faster and more efficient Google Tensor G2 chipset.
- Brighter and smoother display with a likely 90Hz refresh rate.
- Slower wired charging speed (18W).
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the nubia Focus.
Google Pixel 7a
- Faster wired charging (22.5W/33W).
- Potentially better battery efficiency with the Unisoc T760.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Tensor G2.
- Inferior camera system with limited image processing capabilities.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an unstated value for the nubia Focus. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility outdoors. While the nubia Focus’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (implied by its segment) also provides a smoother scrolling experience than the likely 60Hz panel on the nubia Focus.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details are missing for the nubia Focus, the Pixel 7a leverages Google’s computational photography expertise. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image quality. The Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role in processing images, delivering consistently excellent results. The nubia Focus likely relies on more basic image processing, resulting in less refined photos. The absence of details on the nubia Focus’s camera suggests it won’t compete with the Pixel 7a’s capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offering substantial performance gains over the Unisoc T760 in the nubia Focus. The T760, built on a 6nm node, utilizes older Cortex-A76 cores, resulting in lower single-core and multi-core scores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Pixel 7a. The Tensor G2 also benefits from Google’s dedicated machine learning capabilities, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life despite its 18W charging. The nubia Focus offers faster charging options at 22.5W or 33W, potentially allowing for quicker top-ups. However, the Pixel 7a’s more efficient chipset and software optimization may offset the charging speed difference in real-world usage. The Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the nubia Focus.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Focus if you prioritize long-term efficiency and are comfortable with a less refined software experience. It’s a good option for users who primarily need a reliable phone for basic tasks and value battery life over raw power. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you demand a top-tier camera, smooth performance for demanding apps, and Google’s signature software features, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.