ZTE nubia Focus Pro vs. Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly superior performance, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. While the nubia Focus Pro offers respectable efficiency, it can't match the Poco F6 Pro's raw power and speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Focus Pro | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 28 | 2024, May 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, Q2 | Available. Released 2024, May 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.1 x 8.5 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 222 g (7.83 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 (market/region dependent), tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Black, White |
| Models | Z2351N | 23113RKC6G |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 382.99 / £ 289.00 / € 310.53 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
ZTE nubia Focus Pro
- Potentially better battery efficiency with Unisoc T760
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Simpler software experience (potentially)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Likely inferior display quality
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1203 nits)
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Higher price tag
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Poco F6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1203 nits, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the nubia Focus Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to compete with this peak brightness. The Poco F6 Pro’s 120Hz refresh rate, coupled with its brightness, provides a smoother and more vibrant viewing experience. We expect the Poco F6 Pro to have a more color accurate panel as well, given Xiaomi’s history with display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the nubia Focus Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Poco F6 Pro is likely to offer a more versatile camera system, benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The ISP enables faster image processing, improved low-light performance, and better video stabilization. While the nubia Focus Pro may suffice for casual photography, the Poco F6 Pro is better equipped for more demanding photographic tasks.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores. This contrasts sharply with the ZTE nubia Focus Pro’s Unisoc T760 (6nm), which relies on older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process also offers superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the Poco F6 Pro’s processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, capable of charging the device to 100% in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the nubia Focus Pro’s 33W charging. While the Poco F6 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 10:29h suggests good battery life. The Unisoc T760 in the nubia Focus Pro is more power efficient, potentially offering longer battery life during light usage, but the Poco F6 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates any concerns about battery drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Focus Pro if you prioritize long-term battery life and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks, and are less concerned with demanding gaming or intensive applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and value incredibly fast charging speeds – even if it means slightly shorter battery life.