ZTE nubia Focus Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience with strong battery life and a bright, vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. However, gamers on a tight budget will find the nubia Focus Pro’s Unisoc T760 a surprisingly capable performer.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Focus Pro | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 28 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, Q2 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.1 x 8.5 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 222 g (7.83 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | Z2351N | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
ZTE nubia Focus Pro
- Potentially faster charging (33W)
- More affordable price point
- Gaming-focused design (assumed)
- Less powerful chipset (Unisoc T760)
- Likely inferior display quality
- Unknown battery capacity
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Superior performance (Exynos 1480)
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Excellent battery life (13:27h active use)
- Slower charging (25W)
- Higher price
- Samsung’s software bloat (subjective)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to an unstated value for the nubia Focus Pro. This brightness advantage translates to better outdoor visibility. While the nubia Focus Pro’s panel technology isn’t specified, the A55’s likely utilizes a high-quality AMOLED panel, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The A55’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption and everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the nubia Focus Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically excels in image processing, and the Galaxy A55 likely benefits from this expertise. The A55’s camera system is expected to deliver more consistent results across various lighting conditions. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55, if equipped, would further enhance image quality, particularly in low light. We can assume the nubia Focus Pro will lean towards value, potentially sacrificing some image quality for a lower price point.
Performance
The Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset, featuring Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.75 GHz, offers a substantial performance uplift over the nubia Focus Pro’s Unisoc T760 (6nm). The A78 cores are architecturally superior to the T760’s A76 cores, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The 4nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1480 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained gaming sessions. While the T760 is adequate for casual gaming, the Exynos 1480 provides a more responsive and future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 13 hours and 27 minutes. While the nubia Focus Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the A55’s longer runtime is significant. The A55 supports 25W wired charging, while the nubia Focus Pro supports 33W. Although the nubia Focus Pro has faster charging on paper, the A55’s larger battery and efficient chipset likely offset this difference, providing a more reliable all-day battery experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Focus Pro if you need a phone primarily for mobile gaming and value performance-per-dollar above all else. Its Unisoc T760 chipset offers respectable power for the price. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more polished, all-around experience with a superior display, longer battery life, and Samsung’s software features and support.