ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra vs. Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 40:41h endurance. However, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro delivers significantly more processing power with the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, making it the better choice for gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 77.2 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 3.04 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~386 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, rotatable lens ring | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Green, Sunrise White | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | Z2463N | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | £ 279.00 / € 243.55 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:41h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (40:41h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (800 charge cycles)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Less powerful processor
- Limited display information
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (1148 nits)
- Fast 67W charging with QC/PD support
- Shorter battery life (11:46h)
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are unknown
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, which translates to excellent visibility outdoors. While the nubia Focus 2 Ultra’s display specs are not provided, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. The X6 Pro’s panel likely benefits from its more modern chipset’s display capabilities. The absence of refresh rate or panel type information for the nubia makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X6 Pro clearly excels in brightness.
Camera Comparison
The context data only indicates that the Poco X6 Pro has a 'Photo / Video' camera. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the X6 Pro likely features a more versatile and capable camera system than the nubia Focus 2 Ultra, which is not known for its camera prowess. The nubia’s camera is likely focused on basic functionality, while the Poco X6 Pro aims for a more competitive imaging experience.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra’s Unisoc T8100 (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s core configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – is architecturally more advanced and clocked higher than the nubia’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This makes the Poco X6 Pro the superior choice for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
The ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 40:41h. This is significantly longer than the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro’s 11:46h active use score. However, the Poco X6 Pro compensates with much faster charging – 67W wired with QC2.0 and PD3.0, achieving 100% charge in just 45 minutes. The nubia Focus 2 Ultra’s 33W charging is considerably slower. The nubia prioritizes longevity, while the Poco X6 Pro prioritizes quick top-ups. The nubia also claims 800 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently travel and have limited access to charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and fast charging, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery longevity.