ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra is the clear winner, offering a remarkable 40:41h endurance. However, the Google Pixel 7a delivers a more polished experience with its Tensor G2 chipset and superior display, making it the better choice for those valuing performance and camera quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 77.2 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 3.04 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~386 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.9 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8100 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, rotatable lens ring | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Green, Sunrise White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | Z2463N | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | £ 279.00 / € 243.55 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:41h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (40:41h endurance)
- Faster charging (33W) than Pixel 7a
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Less powerful processor than Pixel 7a
- Display brightness and quality likely inferior to Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (1070 nits)
- Excellent camera with Google’s image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life than nubia Focus 2 Ultra
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to the nubia Focus 2 Ultra (brightness data unavailable). This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the nubia’s panel specifics are unknown, the Pixel 7a’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Pixel 7a likely benefits from OLED technology, offering superior contrast and color accuracy, features not explicitly detailed for the nubia. The Pixel 7a’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption and everyday use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a key strength, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details are missing for the nubia Focus 2 Ultra, the Pixel 7a’s focus on both photo and video processing, combined with features like Magic Eraser, provides a more versatile and user-friendly experience. The Pixel 7a’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. Without detailed camera specs for the nubia, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Pixel 7a’s established reputation and software optimizations give it a distinct advantage.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm) chipset represents a significant leap in processing power compared to the ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra’s Unisoc T8100 (6nm). The Tensor G2’s CPU configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides faster single-core and multi-core performance. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the nubia’s octa-core CPU (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is capable, it’s unlikely to match the Tensor G2’s overall performance, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Pixel 7a will offer a smoother, more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra dominates in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 40:41h rating. This is significantly longer than the Pixel 7a’s reported 76h (likely a misinterpretation of talk time, not general usage). The nubia’s 800 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health. While the Pixel 7a offers 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, the nubia’s 33W wired charging is faster, though still not class-leading. The nubia’s larger battery capacity and optimized power management clearly prioritize longevity, making it the ideal choice for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE nubia Focus 2 Ultra if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from a charger. It’s ideal for travelers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone who simply hates battery anxiety. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a consistently excellent camera system, even if it means charging your phone more frequently.