ZTE nubia Air vs. Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value

The smartphone landscape offers a spectrum of priorities. The ZTE nubia Air boldly stakes its claim as an endurance champion, while the Xiaomi 13 Pro represents the pinnacle of current flagship technology. This comparison dissects these contrasting philosophies, revealing which device best suits your usage patterns and budget.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and a premium experience, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, stunning display, and blazing-fast charging outweigh the nubia Air’s exceptional battery life. However, if battery anxiety is your primary concern, the nubia Air is a compelling alternative.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE nubia Air Xiaomi 13 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2025, September 052022, December 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, September 16Available. Released 2022, December 14
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.2 x 76.6 x 6.7 mm (6.46 x 3.02 x 0.26 in)162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight172 g (6.07 oz)210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1224 x 2720 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~440 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, 4500 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetUnisoc T8300 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP2Adreno 740
OSAndroid 15Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lenses-
FeaturesLED flashLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video1080p@30fps8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single20 MP32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging33W wired120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 4820 mAh
Misc
ColorsTitanium Black, Titanium DesertCeramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue
ModelsZ2468N2210132G, 2210132C
PriceAbout 220 EURAbout 750 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 115h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)
EU LABEL
Battery49:00h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass D (46 falls)-
RepairabilityClass B-

ZTE nubia Air

  • Exceptional battery life (49:00h endurance)
  • Long battery lifespan (1000 charge cycles)
  • Potentially more affordable price point

  • Slower charging speed (33W)
  • Less powerful processor (Unisoc T8300)
  • Limited display details

Xiaomi 13 Pro

  • Flagship performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
  • Ultra-fast charging (120W wired, 50W wireless)
  • Bright and vibrant display (1253 nits)

  • Shorter battery life (10:55h active use)
  • Higher price tag
  • May require more frequent charging

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1253 nits, compared to the nubia Air’s unspecified brightness. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the nubia Air’s display specs are missing, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio and likely LTPO technology (based on Xiaomi’s flagship history) suggest a more dynamic and power-efficient viewing experience. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s display is geared towards media consumption and gaming, while the nubia Air’s display likely prioritizes efficiency.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but details are limited for the nubia Air. The Xiaomi 13 Pro, typical of flagship Xiaomi phones, likely includes a sophisticated camera system with advanced image processing. While sensor sizes and specific lens details are missing, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience. The nubia Air’s camera is likely adequate for everyday use, but won’t compete with the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s expected capabilities.

Performance

The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores. This architecture, built on a 4nm process, delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance than the nubia Air’s Unisoc T8300 (6nm). The nubia Air’s octa-core CPU, while capable, is comprised of less powerful Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The 4nm node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also offers better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Xiaomi 13 Pro is the clear choice for demanding users.

Battery Life

Battery life is where the nubia Air shines. Its claimed 49:00h endurance rating dwarfs the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 10:55h active use score and 115h endurance rating. However, the Xiaomi 13 Pro compensates with incredibly fast charging: 120W wired (0-100% in 19 minutes), 50W wireless (0-100% in 36 minutes), and even 10W reverse wireless charging. The nubia Air’s 33W wired charging is comparatively slow. The nubia Air prioritizes longevity, while the Xiaomi 13 Pro prioritizes quick top-ups. The nubia Air also boasts a claimed 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE nubia Air if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, and you prioritize longevity over raw processing power. It’s ideal for travelers, minimalists, or those who frequently find themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prefer a top-tier flagship experience with cutting-edge performance, a vibrant display, and incredibly fast charging, and are willing to charge your phone more frequently.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How does the Unisoc T8300 in the nubia Air compare to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for gaming?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is significantly more powerful for gaming. Its Adreno GPU and optimized architecture will deliver higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in demanding titles. The Unisoc T8300 is capable of casual gaming, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at high settings.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the nubia Air slow compared to the Xiaomi 13 Pro's 120W?
Yes, 33W is considerably slower. While sufficient for overnight charging, it will take significantly longer to replenish the battery compared to the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W, which can fully charge the phone in under 20 minutes. This difference is most noticeable when you need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Xiaomi 13 Pro get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is thermally efficient, but demanding games will still generate heat. Xiaomi typically employs effective cooling solutions in their flagship devices, mitigating throttling and maintaining stable performance for extended periods. However, some heat is expected.
❓ What type of user would benefit most from the nubia Air's 1000 charge cycle rating?
Users who plan to keep their phone for several years and prioritize long-term battery health will benefit most. The 1000 charge cycle rating suggests the battery will retain a higher capacity after extended use compared to phones with lower cycle ratings.