The ZTE Blade V80 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11i represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Blade V80 Pro aims for affordability and efficiency with its Unisoc chipset, while the Mi 11i prioritizes performance with the flagship-level Snapdragon 888. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mi 11i is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 888 offers a substantial leap in processing power, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. However, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro provides a compelling value proposition for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2025, December | Available. Released 2021, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 166 x 79 x 7.7 mm (6.54 x 3.11 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 900 x 1940 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~317 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 112.2 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7280 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired
10W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White | Celestial Silver, Frosty White, Cosmic Black |
| Models | - | M2012K11G |
| Price | - | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 96h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 690021 (v8)
GeekBench: 3641 (v5.1) |
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly lower processing power
- Less detailed display specifications
- Likely inferior camera performance
Xiaomi Mi 11i
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 888 performance
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 33W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load
- May not offer significantly longer battery life despite efficiency improvements
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11i boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 939 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the ZTE Blade V80 Pro. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the Mi 11i’s superior brightness is a tangible advantage. The Blade V80 Pro’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more basic panel likely optimized for power efficiency rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Mi 11i likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, offering advanced features like improved low-light performance and faster image processing. Without specific sensor details for the Blade V80 Pro, it’s difficult to assess its camera quality, but it likely relies on software processing to compensate for a less capable sensor. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests a reliance on digital stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Mi 11i’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A78 cores and four Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture is designed for peak performance. In contrast, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro utilizes the Unisoc T7280 (12nm), with a dual-core Cortex-A75 setup and six Cortex-A55 cores. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 provides superior power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Mi 11i will deliver a far smoother experience in graphically intensive games and applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 96 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite the Mi 11i’s more powerful processor. However, the Mi 11i offers significantly faster charging at 33W with support for PD3.0 and QC3, achieving a 100% charge in just 52 minutes. The Blade V80 Pro’s 22.5W charging is slower, and while it includes 10W reverse wired charging, the Mi 11i’s faster charging speed is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V80 Pro if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption, and prioritize battery life over raw power. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11i if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, and other resource-intensive applications, and value a smoother, more responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T7280 in the ZTE Blade V80 Pro struggle with multitasking or demanding apps?
Yes, the Unisoc T7280 is a mid-range chipset designed for basic tasks. While it can handle everyday use, it will likely exhibit lag and slowdowns when running multiple apps simultaneously or playing graphically intensive games. The Mi 11i’s Snapdragon 888 is far better equipped for these scenarios.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 11i a significant advantage over the ZTE Blade V80 Pro's 22.5W charging?
Absolutely. The Mi 11i can reach a full charge in approximately 52 minutes, while the Blade V80 Pro will take considerably longer. This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 888 in the Mi 11i overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While the Mi 11i incorporates thermal management solutions, some throttling may occur during extended gaming sessions. However, the 5nm process node is more efficient than the 12nm Unisoc T7280, meaning the Mi 11i will likely maintain higher performance for longer before throttling becomes noticeable.
