ZTE Blade V80 Pro vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, feature-rich experience and excellent camera capabilities, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the clear winner. However, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro offers a surprisingly capable experience at a significantly lower price point, making it ideal for budget-conscious consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2025, December | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 79 x 7.7 mm (6.54 x 3.11 x 0.30 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 900 x 1940 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~317 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 112.2 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7280 (12 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired 10W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | - | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V80 Pro
- Significantly lower price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Decent battery endurance
- Less powerful processor
- Inferior camera system
- Slower charging speeds
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Powerful Google Tensor chip
- Exceptional camera performance
- Fast wired and wireless charging
- High price tag
- Potential for software bloat
- Larger size and weight
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 846 nits measured, compared to an unspecified brightness for the ZTE Blade V80 Pro. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Pixel 6 Pro’s display is described as having an infinite contrast ratio, this is a nominal value common to OLED panels. The Blade V80 Pro’s display technology is not specified, suggesting it likely utilizes an IPS LCD, which typically offers lower contrast and narrower viewing angles. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display and potentially higher resolution (not specified for the Blade V80 Pro) contribute to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is a major differentiator, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are not provided for either device, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Tensor chip, are renowned for their dynamic range and detail. The ZTE Blade V80 Pro likely features a more basic camera setup, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. The absence of details regarding OIS or advanced features on the Blade V80 Pro suggests a less sophisticated camera experience. The Pixel 6 Pro’s superior processing power allows for features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode, unavailable on the ZTE device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Google Pixel 6 Pro utilizes Google’s custom 5nm Tensor chip, featuring a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-X1 prime cores clocked at 2.80 GHz. This architecture prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. Conversely, the ZTE Blade V80 Pro is powered by the Unisoc T7280 (12nm), an octa-core processor with Cortex-A75 and A55 cores. The 12nm process node of the Unisoc chip is less efficient than the 5nm Tensor, resulting in lower performance and potentially higher power consumption. The Pixel 6 Pro’s CPU configuration, particularly the inclusion of Cortex-X1 cores, provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Pixel 6 Pro offers significantly faster charging capabilities: 23W wired with PD3.0 and 50% charge in 30 minutes, alongside 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. The ZTE Blade V80 Pro is limited to 22.5W wired charging and 10W reverse wired charging. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Pixel 6 Pro’s faster charging speeds and wireless charging options provide greater convenience and flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V80 Pro if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and aren't demanding of high-end gaming or photography. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prioritize a premium experience with a powerful processor, exceptional camera performance, and long-term software support, and are willing to pay a substantial price premium.