The ZTE Blade V80 Design and Nokia G100 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they take different approaches to core components like the chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more established software ecosystem, the Nokia G100 emerges as the better choice. While the ZTE Blade V80 Design boasts faster 22.5W charging, the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 provides a smoother, more reliable experience for daily tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 44, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 10 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November | Available. Released 2022, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 79 x 7.7 mm (6.54 x 3.11 x 0.30 in) | 166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 195.1 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 900 x 1940 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~317 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 112.2 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7280 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0"
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired
10W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Pale Amber, Celadon Cyan, Peach Fuzz | Nordic Blue |
| Models | Z2575 | - |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 60 EUR |
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- Faster 22.5W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance (on paper)
- Competitive price point
- Unisoc chipset may exhibit more throttling
- Software optimization likely less refined than Qualcomm
Nokia G100
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 offers smoother performance
- Better thermal management and sustained performance
- More established software ecosystem and updates
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internal components, we can infer both likely utilize standard LCD panels common in this price segment. The absence of specifications like resolution or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost optimization. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be adequate for everyday use but not ideal for color-critical work. The display is not a differentiating factor.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup geared towards general photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light conditions. Image processing will likely be the key differentiator, and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally provides superior image quality and faster processing speeds compared to Unisoc’s offerings. The Nokia G100 is likely to produce more consistently pleasing photos, particularly in challenging lighting scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Blade V80 Design utilizes the Unisoc T7280, a 12nm processor with a heterogeneous core configuration – two Cortex-A75 cores for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. The Nokia G100, however, features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, fabricated on an 11nm process. While the Unisoc chip has higher clocked 'performance' cores (2.2GHz vs 2.0GHz), Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 662 benefits from superior architectural efficiency and software optimization. The Snapdragon 662’s Kryo cores, while clocked slightly lower, are generally more efficient and deliver a smoother experience in sustained workloads. This translates to less noticeable lag during multitasking and a more consistent frame rate in games. The Nokia G100 will likely exhibit better thermal management, preventing performance throttling under load.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade V80 Design’s 22.5W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Nokia G100’s 15W charging. This means significantly faster top-up times, potentially reducing downtime. However, battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. The faster charging of the ZTE Blade V80 Design could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity, making it a better choice for users who frequently need a quick power boost. Conversely, the Nokia G100, with a potentially larger battery, could offer longer overall battery life despite the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V80 Design if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 22.5W charging is a significant advantage in this price bracket. Buy the Nokia G100 if you value a more balanced experience with a proven chipset, Qualcomm’s software optimizations, and a generally more responsive user interface, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T7280 in the ZTE Blade V80 Design struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T7280 can run PUBG Mobile, expect to use lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 will provide a smoother gaming experience overall, allowing for higher settings and more consistent performance due to its architectural advantages and software optimization.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the ZTE Blade V80 Design with the 22.5W charger?
Assuming a typical battery capacity for this price range (around 4000-5000mAh), the ZTE Blade V80 Design should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Nokia G100’s 15W charging.
❓ Does the Nokia G100 receive regular software updates and security patches?
Nokia is known for providing relatively consistent software updates and security patches, even for its budget devices. This is a significant advantage over many other brands in this price segment, ensuring your phone remains secure and benefits from the latest features and optimizations.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Unisoc T7280 and Snapdragon 662 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. While both chipsets can handle basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 provides a smoother and more responsive experience, especially when multitasking or switching between apps. The Unisoc T7280 may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering under heavier loads.
