ZTE Blade V50 Vita vs Realme C55: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Choices

The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The ZTE Blade V50 Vita and Realme C55 both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The V50 Vita focuses on a streamlined experience with a Unisoc chipset, while the C55 leverages MediaTek’s Helio G88 and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Realme C55 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G88 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Unisoc T606 in the ZTE Blade V50 Vita, and the 33W charging significantly reduces downtime. While both offer similar battery endurance, the C55’s faster charging is a crucial advantage.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade V50 Vita Realme C55
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, September2023, March 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, OctoberAvailable. Released 2023, March 08
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions167.4 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.59 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight204 g (7.20 oz)189.5 g (6.70 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density)
Size6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2
OSAndroid 13Android 13, Realme UI 4.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal256GB 4GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual-64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-8 MP, (wide)
Triple50 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single8 MP, (wide)8 MP, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired33W wired, 50% in 29 min
TypeLi-Po 5200 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueSun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest
Models-RMX3710
PriceAbout 110 EUR₹ 8,399
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 123h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -31.8 LUFS (Below average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 257263 (v9) GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6) GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade V50 Vita

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Simple and streamlined software experience
  • Decent battery endurance

  • Weaker processor performance
  • Slower charging speeds
  • Limited camera details

Realme C55

  • Faster processor for smoother performance
  • Significantly faster 33W charging
  • Brighter display for outdoor visibility

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • Similar battery endurance to the ZTE
  • Camera specs are still limited

Display Comparison

Both phones offer a similar display experience, with the Realme C55 boasting a measured peak brightness of 659 nits and a 1264:1 contrast ratio. While the ZTE Blade V50 Vita’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be in the same ballpark given its price point. The Realme C55’s higher measured brightness will translate to better visibility outdoors. The identical contrast ratios suggest similar color reproduction capabilities, though a direct comparison would require calibration.

Camera Comparison

Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor. Given Realme’s history, the C55 likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone is a photography powerhouse.

Performance

The Realme C55’s MediaTek Helio G88 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) demonstrably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita’s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The higher clock speeds of the Cortex-A75 cores in the Helio G88, combined with a slightly more efficient architecture, result in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are 12nm, the G88 is optimized for gaming, offering a better experience for casual gamers. The V50 Vita will handle basic tasks, but will struggle with more demanding applications.

Battery Life

Both the ZTE Blade V50 Vita and Realme C55 achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme C55’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage. It can reach 50% charge in just 29 minutes, while the ZTE Blade V50 Vita’s 18W charging will take considerably longer. This faster charging capability minimizes downtime and makes the C55 more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Blade V50 Vita if you prioritize a simple, no-frills Android experience and are less concerned with demanding applications or gaming. It’s a solid option for basic communication and light social media use. Buy the Realme C55 if you want a more responsive device capable of handling moderate gaming and multitasking, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. The C55 is better suited for users who actively use their phones throughout the day.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Helio G88 in the Realme C55 capable of playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G88 can handle PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to use medium graphics settings for a smooth experience. It’s not a gaming powerhouse, but it’s significantly more capable than the Unisoc T606 in the ZTE Blade V50 Vita for gaming.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the ZTE Blade V50 Vita with the 18W charger?
Given the 18W charging and a typical battery capacity for this segment, a full charge from 0% on the ZTE Blade V50 Vita will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. This is considerably slower than the Realme C55’s 33W charging.
❓ Does the Realme C55 support reverse charging, allowing it to charge other devices?
Unfortunately, neither the official specifications nor readily available reviews indicate that the Realme C55 supports reverse charging. It focuses solely on fast wired charging for its own battery.
❓ What type of storage does the Realme C55 use – UFS or eMMC – and how does this affect performance?
While not explicitly stated, Realme typically uses UFS storage in this price range. UFS is significantly faster than eMMC, resulting in quicker app loading times and improved overall system responsiveness. This contributes to the Realme C55’s smoother performance compared to the ZTE Blade V50 Vita.