The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo aims to deliver strong performance with its newer Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset, while the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G focuses on a balance of efficiency with the Unisoc T606. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo is the better buy. Its Dimensity 6080 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a substantial performance uplift over the ZTE Blade V50 Design’s Unisoc T606. While the ZTE offers reasonable efficiency, the Poco’s faster processing speeds justify the slight trade-off.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October | 2024, March 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October | Available. Released 2024, March 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Beach Green, Sunrise Violet, Diamont Black | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Martian Orange |
| Models | - | MZB0GGWIN, 2312FRAFDI |
| Price | About 120 EUR | ₹ 18,990 |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
- More power-efficient chipset (Unisoc T606)
- Potentially longer battery life during moderate use
- Lower price point (likely)
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Poco X6 Neo
- Less capable GPU for gaming
- Slower charging speed (22.5W)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo
- Faster and more responsive performance (Dimensity 6080)
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Faster charging (33W)
- Less power-efficient chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of specifications like refresh rate or resolution suggests a focus on cost-cutting. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for budget devices. The real difference will be in viewing angles and peak brightness, which are unknown but likely similar.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature a primary camera supplemented by basic depth or macro sensors. The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will rely on software processing. The Poco X6 Neo, benefiting from its more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 6080, will likely deliver better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to superior noise reduction and dynamic range. The ZTE’s image processing will likely be more basic.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo’s Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the ZTE Blade V50 Design’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 6nm process allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency *at the same performance level*, but Mediatek has also significantly boosted clock speeds – 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores in the ZTE. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Poco’s GPU will also be significantly more capable. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the faster chipset will allow the Poco to handle more demanding applications without slowdowns.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G benefits from the efficiency of its 12nm Unisoc T606 chipset. While the Poco X6 Neo has faster 33W charging compared to the ZTE’s 22.5W, the 6nm Dimensity 6080 will consume more power under load. This means the ZTE will likely offer longer battery life during moderate usage. However, the Poco’s faster charging will minimize downtime, allowing for quicker top-ups. The actual 0-100% charge times will depend on battery capacity, which is not specified, but the Poco will undoubtedly be faster.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G if you prioritize long-term battery life and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Neo if you want a smoother experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and are willing to accept slightly faster battery drain.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X6 Neo’s Dimensity 6080 get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 6080 is a relatively efficient chip, but it will generate more heat than the Unisoc T606 under sustained load. While thermal throttling is possible, the Poco X6 Neo likely incorporates basic thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. Expect some warmth, but not necessarily debilitating performance drops.
❓ Is the 4G connectivity on the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G a significant limitation in 2024?
For users in areas with strong 4G coverage, it may not be a major issue. However, 5G offers significantly faster speeds and lower latency. If you live in an area with 5G availability and frequently stream high-resolution video or engage in online gaming, the lack of 5G on the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G will be noticeable.
❓ How much of a difference will the faster charging on the Poco X6 Neo make in daily use?
The 33W charging on the Poco X6 Neo will significantly reduce charging times compared to the ZTE’s 22.5W. While exact times depend on battery capacity, you can expect to gain several hours of usage with just a short 15-20 minute charge, making it ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
