Realme 12 Pro+ vs ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison

The smartphone market offers a wide spectrum of choices, from flagship powerhouses to ultra-affordable options. We're pitting the Realme 12 Pro+, a mid-range contender boasting a Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and rapid charging, against the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G, a budget-focused device powered by a Unisoc T606. This comparison aims to dissect their strengths and weaknesses, helping you determine which device best aligns with your priorities and budget.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Realme 12 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset, coupled with 67W charging and a brighter display, offers a significantly smoother and more enjoyable experience. However, the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget.

PHONES
Phone Names ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G Realme 12 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41
5G bands-1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2023, October2024, January 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, OctoberAvailable. Released 2024, January 29
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, glass back-
Dimensions165 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.33 in)161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight207 g (7.30 oz)196 g (6.91 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 710
OSAndroid 13Android 14, Realme UI 5.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)No
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging22.5W wired67W wired, 50% in 19 min
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBeach Green, Sunrise Violet, Diamont BlackSubmarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red
Models-RMX3840, RMX3841
PriceAbout 120 EUR$ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400

ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G

  • Significantly lower price point
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks
  • Acceptable performance for light usage

  • Outdated Unisoc T606 chipset
  • Slow 22.5W charging
  • Likely lower display quality

Realme 12 Pro+

  • Powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
  • Ultra-fast 67W charging
  • Bright and vibrant display (802 nits)
  • Excellent battery life (13:24h active use)

  • Higher price compared to ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G
  • May be overkill for basic users

Display Comparison

The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G’s panel technology isn’t specified, it’s likely a standard LCD, whereas the Realme 12 Pro+ likely utilizes AMOLED, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. Bezels and color calibration data are unavailable for the ZTE device, but the Realme 12 Pro+ is expected to offer a more immersive viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The Realme’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s ISP, will likely deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G likely relies on software processing to compensate for a less capable sensor, potentially resulting in softer images and less dynamic range.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+’s Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 features newer Cortex-A78 cores (2.40 GHz) compared to the older Cortex-A75 cores (1.6 GHz) in the Unisoc chip. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon also provides superior power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This means smoother multitasking, faster app launches, and a more responsive overall experience on the Realme 12 Pro+. The Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications and games.

Battery Life

The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in the charging department with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G’s 22.5W charging is considerably slower. While the Realme 12 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 13:24h demonstrates excellent battery life, likely due to the efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset. The ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G’s battery life will likely be shorter due to the less efficient Unisoc processor, and the slower charging will require longer periods plugged into a power source.

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prioritize a responsive user experience, faster app loading times, better gaming performance, and the convenience of rapid charging, even if it means spending more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G sufficient for playing games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T606 can technically run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at lower graphics settings and frame rates. The chipset lacks the processing power and GPU performance to deliver a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience at higher settings. The Realme 12 Pro+ with its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is far better suited for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ compared to the 22.5W charging on the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ is dramatically faster. It can reach 50% charge in just 19 minutes, while the ZTE Blade V50 Design 4G will take considerably longer – likely over an hour to reach the same level. This difference is significant for users who need to quickly top up their battery before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Realme 12 Pro+ experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s 4nm process and the Realme 12 Pro+'s thermal management system are designed to minimize throttling. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the device is expected to maintain stable performance for extended periods, unlike devices with less efficient chipsets.