ZTE’s Blade series consistently targets the budget-conscious consumer, but within that segment, choices exist. The Blade V41 Vita and A72s represent two distinct approaches: the V41 Vita prioritizes processing power with a Mediatek Dimensity 810, while the A72s opts for the Unisoc T606, potentially emphasizing efficiency. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the ZTE Blade V41 Vita is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 810 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the A72s’ Unisoc T606, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While both phones share 22.5W charging, the V41 Vita’s superior processing power justifies its likely higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - V1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - V1 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 7, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA - V2 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, June 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 23 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 168 x 77.5 x 8.6 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 3GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, (wideo), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black | Space Gray, Sky Blue |
| Models | 8140N | A7050 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 120 EUR |
ZTE Blade V41 Vita
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 810)
- Better gaming performance
- Potential for smoother display experience
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Likely higher price
ZTE Blade A72s
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Lower price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Slower processor (Unisoc T606)
- Limited gaming capabilities
- Less responsive user experience
Display Comparison
Neither ZTE provides display specifications beyond size, so a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests a potential disparity in graphics processing capabilities, which could impact display responsiveness. The V41 Vita’s Dimensity 810 is capable of driving higher refresh rate panels, suggesting it *could* support a smoother visual experience if paired with a suitable display (though this isn't confirmed).
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the processing power of the Dimensity 810 in the V41 Vita suggests superior image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The A72s will likely rely more heavily on software processing, which may not be as refined. It's reasonable to assume the V41 Vita will offer a more versatile camera experience, even if the sensor sizes are similar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) boasts a significantly more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the A72s’ Unisoc T606 (12nm) with 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 810 also translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 12nm Unisoc chip. This means the V41 Vita will handle demanding tasks and games with greater ease and less throttling. The A75 cores in the A72s are older architecture, resulting in lower single-core and multi-core performance.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 22.5W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds – approximately 60-90 minutes for a full charge. However, the Unisoc T606’s 12nm process is generally more power-efficient than the Dimensity 810’s 6nm process. This *could* translate to slightly longer battery life on the A72s during typical usage, despite potentially having the same battery capacity. The V41 Vita’s higher performance demands will consume more power, but the difference may not be substantial for light users.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V41 Vita if you need a phone capable of handling modern mobile games, multitasking, and benefit from 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users who want a responsive experience and aren’t willing to compromise on processing power. Buy the ZTE Blade A72s if you prioritize a potentially longer battery life due to the more efficient Unisoc chipset and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. It’s a good choice for those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the ZTE Blade V41 Vita handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 810 in the V41 Vita is capable of running these games, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Unisoc T606 in the A72s will struggle with these titles, offering a significantly less enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The V41 Vita will feel snappier and more responsive when switching between apps, loading web pages, and scrolling through social media feeds. The A72s will perform these tasks adequately, but with a slight lag compared to the V41 Vita.
❓ Does the ZTE Blade A72s support 5G connectivity?
No, the Unisoc T606 chipset in the A72s is a 4G-only processor. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita, with its Dimensity 810, supports 5G connectivity, offering faster download and upload speeds where available.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones with the 22.5W charger?
Both phones should fully charge in approximately 60-90 minutes using the included 22.5W charger. However, the V41 Vita might reach 100% slightly slower due to its higher power consumption during charging.
