Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't completely compromise on features? The ZTE Blade V41 Vita and Xiaomi Redmi 9C are both contenders, offering affordability and essential functionality. But which one truly delivers the best value for your money?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The ZTE Blade V41 Vita clearly wins this comparison. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 810 chipset, faster charging, and likely improved camera performance make it a superior choice despite potentially a slightly higher price. The Redmi 9C remains a viable option for the absolute budget-conscious.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - V1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - V1 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 7, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA - V2 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2020, June 30. Released 2020, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 23 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 164.9 x 77 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black | Midnight Gray, Sunrise Orange, Twilight Blue |
| Models | 8140N | M2006C3MG, M2006C3MT |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.52 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
ZTE Blade V41 Vita
- Significantly faster performance
- Faster 22.5W charging
- Likely better camera quality
- More modern chipset (6nm process)
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Design might be less appealing to some
Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Very affordable
- Large 5000mAh battery
- Decent for basic tasks
- Slow performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Mediocre camera
- Outdated chipset (12nm process)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.53-inch display, likely with an HD+ resolution. While the panels are similar in size, the ZTE Blade V41 Vita might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to its more modern chipset and potential display technology improvements. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The ZTE Blade V41 Vita likely boasts a more capable camera system. While both phones probably feature a primary 13MP sensor, the Dimensity 810's image signal processor (ISP) will likely result in better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The Redmi 9C's camera is adequate for basic photography.
Performance
This is where the ZTE Blade V41 Vita shines. The Dimensity 810 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G35. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the ZTE. The Redmi 9C will struggle with more demanding apps and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the ZTE Blade V41 Vita's 22.5W fast charging is a significant advantage over the Redmi 9C's 10W charging, allowing for much quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The ZTE Blade V41 Vita is ideal for users who prioritize performance, smoother multitasking, and faster charging. It's a good choice for light gaming and everyday tasks. The Xiaomi Redmi 9C is best suited for users on a very tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic calling, texting, and occasional social media browsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The ZTE Blade V41 Vita is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. It will handle games much smoother than the Redmi 9C.
❓ How much faster is the ZTE Blade V41 Vita?
The ZTE Blade V41 Vita's Dimensity 810 chipset offers a substantial performance boost, estimated to be 2-3 times faster than the Redmi 9C's Helio G35 in real-world usage.
