ZTE Blade V41 Vita vs Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: A Detailed Comparison

The ZTE Blade V41 Vita and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge in their core hardware choices, impacting performance, display quality, and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more vibrant display and established brand reliability, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is the better choice. However, the ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s newer Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset offers a potential edge in raw processing power for demanding tasks, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.

PHONES
Phone Names	ZTE Blade V41 Vita	Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - V1	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - V1	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	2, 7, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA - V2	-

Launch
Announced	2022, December 07	2022, March 17
Status	Available. Released 2022, December 23	Available. Released 2022, April 20

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	-	159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	-	186 g (6.56 oz)
	-	IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)
Size	6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2	6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 90Hz	Super AMOLED, 90Hz

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm)	Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G68
OS	Android 12, MyOS 12	Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (dedicated slot)	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 6GB RAM	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	-

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad	-	48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single	8 MP, (wide)	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Triple	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	-
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps

Selfie camera
Single	8 MP, (wide)	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers

Comms
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE	5.1, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	Unspecified	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	22.5W wired	25W wired
Type	Li-Po 4500 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Starry Black	Black, White, Blue, Peach
Models	8140N	SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360
Price	About 300 EUR	£ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999
SAR	-	0.35 W/kg (head)
SAR EU	-	0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 104h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.5 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9) GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

ZTE Blade V41 Vita

Newer Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset offers potential performance advantages.
Competitive 22.5W fast charging.
Potentially lower price point.

Display brightness likely lower than the Samsung A33 5G.
Less established brand reputation and software support.
Camera system likely less sophisticated.

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

Brighter 728 nit display for better outdoor visibility.
More refined software experience with Samsung’s One UI.
Likely superior camera system with OIS.

Older Exynos 1280 chipset may throttle under sustained load.
Potentially higher price point.
Charging speed only marginally faster.

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 728 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the ZTE Blade V41 Vita. This higher peak brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. While both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on Samsung’s typical implementation and market trends for this price point), the A33’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a more optimized panel with deeper blacks. The lack of refresh rate information for the V41 Vita is a drawback; the A33’s likely 90Hz panel (common for this model) provides a smoother scrolling experience.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer ‘Photo/Video’ capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are scarce. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system, leveraging Samsung’s image processing expertise. While both phones likely include a primary sensor, the A33’s sensor size is expected to be larger, capturing more light and resulting in better low-light performance. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A33 (a common feature in this range) would further enhance image quality, particularly in videos. The V41 Vita’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the ZTE Blade V41 Vita features the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm), while the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G utilizes the Exynos 1280 (5nm). Although both CPUs feature a 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76/A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, the Exynos 1280’s 5nm process node offers superior power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. However, the Dimensity 810 is a newer chip, potentially benefiting from architectural improvements. The V41 Vita’s 6nm process is still efficient, but the A33’s 5nm node gives it an edge in thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM specifications are missing for both, but LPDDR4X is likely on both devices.

Battery Life

Both the ZTE Blade V41 Vita and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. The A33 5G supports 25W wired charging, slightly faster than the V41 Vita’s 22.5W charging. While the difference isn’t massive, it translates to a quicker top-up time. The comparable endurance ratings suggest that software optimization and power efficiency of the respective chipsets play a significant role in battery performance, offsetting any differences in battery capacity (which is not specified for either device).

Buying Guide

Buy the ZTE Blade V41 Vita if you need a phone primarily for gaming and multitasking, and are comfortable with a less-refined software experience. The Dimensity 810’s architecture provides a performance boost for the price. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G if you prioritize a brighter, more color-accurate display, a more polished user interface, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s established software support and brand reputation.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?

While the Exynos 1280 is a capable chip, it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load. However, Samsung’s software optimizations and the A33’s cooling system mitigate this to some extent. Expect some performance reduction after extended gaming, but it shouldn’t be severe enough to render the phone unusable.

❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up shots?

Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited utility. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They are primarily included for marketing purposes and rarely deliver truly impressive macro photography. Expect soft, often blurry results.

❓ Can the ZTE Blade V41 Vita handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates?

The Dimensity 810 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but achieving consistently high frame rates (60fps or higher) at maximum settings may be challenging. You’ll likely need to balance graphics settings to maintain a smooth gaming experience. The newer architecture of the Dimensity 810 gives it an edge over the Exynos 1280 in this scenario.

❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?

With 25W charging on the Galaxy A33 5G, a full charge from 0% should take approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s 22.5W charging will likely take slightly longer, around 2 to 2.5 hours, depending on usage during charging.