ZTE Blade V41 Vita vs. OnePlus Nord N20 5G: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter display, the OnePlus Nord N20 5G emerges as the better choice. While the ZTE Blade V41 Vita offers a slightly faster charging speed, the Nord N20 5G’s Snapdragon 695 provides a more refined user experience and a demonstrably brighter screen.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade V41 Vita | OnePlus Nord N20 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - V1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - V1 | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 7, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA - V2 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 23 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black | Blue |
| Models | 8140N | GN2200, CPH2459 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 129h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 316974 (v8), 380672 (v9) GeekBench: 1945 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
ZTE Blade V41 Vita
- Faster 22.5W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- MediaTek Dimensity 810 offers solid performance for the price
- Likely dimmer display compared to the Nord N20 5G
- Older generation CPU architecture
OnePlus Nord N20 5G
- Brighter 647 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the ZTE Blade V41 Vita
- Endurance rating is the same as the ZTE, despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N20 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 647 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for budget phones. While the ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of this brightness level. The Nord N20 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical IPS panel, but the high brightness mitigates the lack of OLED’s perfect blacks. Bezels are likely comparable on both devices given their price points, and color accuracy is an area where OnePlus typically performs well, though independent testing would be needed for confirmation.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without specific sensor sizes, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, OnePlus generally prioritizes image processing and software optimization, potentially yielding better results even with a similar sensor. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant; these sensors typically produce low-quality images and are more of a marketing feature than a practical benefit.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm process technology, but the underlying architectures differ significantly. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The OnePlus Nord N20 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 employs 2x 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While clock speeds are slightly higher on the Dimensity 810, the Cortex-A76 cores are older generation compared to the Kryo 660 Gold cores, which benefit from Qualcomm’s architectural improvements. This translates to a more efficient and responsive experience on the Nord N20 5G, particularly in sustained workloads. RAM speed is not specified for either device, but LPDDR4X is a likely common denominator, limiting overall memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
Both the ZTE Blade V41 Vita and OnePlus Nord N20 5G share an endurance rating of 129 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. The Nord N20 5G’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the V41 Vita’s 22.5W charging. This means the Nord N20 5G can replenish its battery from 0-100% in a shorter timeframe, a crucial convenience factor for many users. The identical endurance ratings suggest that software optimization and power efficiency of the Snapdragon 695 offset any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V41 Vita if you prioritize fast charging and are heavily invested in the MediaTek ecosystem, potentially benefiting from optimized software support. Buy the OnePlus Nord N20 5G if you value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions, and a generally smoother, more responsive user experience thanks to Qualcomm’s chipset and software optimizations.