ZTE Blade V41 Vita vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022): Which 5G Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and responsiveness, the ZTE Blade V41 Vita emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset provides a noticeable edge in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) is a strong contender for those valuing stylus functionality and quicker charging, despite its less powerful processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | ZTE Blade V41 Vita | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - V1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - V1 | 1, 2, 5, 12, 14, 24, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 7, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA - V2 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, April 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 23 | Available. Released 2022, April 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 168.9 x 75.8 x 9.3 mm (6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | Stylus Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MyOS 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 10W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black | Steel Blue, Seafoam Green |
| Models | 8140N | XT2215, XT2215-1, XT2215-2, XT2215-3, XT2215-4 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 66.60 |
ZTE Blade V41 Vita
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Significantly faster 22.5W charging
- Potentially better CPU-intensive app performance
- Likely lacks stylus functionality
- Slower charging than some competitors (though faster than Moto)
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and creativity
- Quick Charge 3.0 compatibility
- Balanced feature set
- Slower processor compared to the ZTE
- Significantly slower 10W charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this price bracket. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity. Bezels are expected to be moderate, typical for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones aiming for acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Without specific sensor details, it's safe to assume both rely on primary sensors around the 50MP mark. The Motorola may benefit from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its efficient noise reduction. However, the ZTE’s more powerful CPU could potentially handle more complex image processing algorithms. The inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to their small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores paired with 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Motorola’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the ZTE. While both are 6nm chips, the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 810 offer a significant architectural advantage in single-core performance. The Snapdragon 695 prioritizes 5G connectivity and efficiency, but falls behind in raw processing power. The impact of RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X on both) is less pronounced than the CPU difference.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely fall in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The key differentiator is charging speed. The ZTE Blade V41 Vita supports 22.5W wired charging, significantly faster than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)’s 10W charging with Quick Charge 3.0 compatibility. This means the ZTE will achieve a full charge in considerably less time, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While the Motorola’s Quick Charge support offers some flexibility, the lower wattage limits its overall charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the ZTE Blade V41 Vita if you need a phone for demanding apps, moderate gaming, and value CPU performance above all else. Its Dimensity 810 offers a significant boost in processing power for the price. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) if you prefer the convenience of a built-in stylus for note-taking and creative tasks, and if you prioritize Quick Charge compatibility for faster top-ups, even if it means sacrificing some processing speed.